Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

A loaf and a block of cheese is not lunch for ten days

999 replies

ZazieSheHer · 12/01/2021 10:00

So some of the free school lunch boxes contain very little food.

Marcus Rashford condemns free school meal packages

“...a package, supposedly containing £30 worth of food to last for 10 days, comprising just a loaf of bread, some cheese, a tin of beans, two carrots, two bananas, three apples, two potatoes, a bag of pasta, three Frubes, two Soreen bars and a tomato”.

mobile.twitter.com/RoadsideMum/status/1348646428084760576

Can’t imagine what it’s like home schooling hungry kids. Would like to say I’m shocked but I’m not.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
NoIDontWatchLoveIsland · 12/01/2021 12:57

Do you really think the catering company is making £20 profit on £30 income for supplying school meals?

mimi0708 · 12/01/2021 12:58

@zaphodbeeble

The company is Chartwells, a division of Compass whose chairman is a Tory donor apparently
This. I can't believe how many times we have let the Tory Government hand out money to their mates/donors during this pandemic. They literally have no shame and doing it in front of our faces when people are losing their jobs. It is starting to get really depressing as it's a new one almost every week. I was actually surprised that these things can just happen without any consequences for the people in power. Where is the rage? And why is the system doesn't have any thing in place for checks and balances? It's is making me so angry.
Katyppp · 12/01/2021 12:58

To be honest, i look at threads like this and wonder when the Government became responsible for feeding children?
And when did people become so entitled that they expected it? And complained because it wasn't enough?
I have really struggled financially in the past, and i have never come anywhere near letting my children go hungry, ever.
I am sorry, but no-one is so poor in the UK that they can't afford to feed their kids.
There may be very specific situations when cash is tight, for example waiting for UC or fleeing domestic abuse, but widespread inability to afford food on a daily basis is a budgeting issue.
It suits the left-wing narrative to promote food poverty, as seen on here, along with the usual juvenile comments about Tories helping their mates out.
I agree there is not enough food to justify the £30 bill, that's obvious.
But the real scandal is that the whole expectation of free food was there in the first place.

deliciouschilli · 12/01/2021 12:59

If they are buying this utter crap in bulk it won't cost anywhere near the £5.00..... Children will definitely be going hungry.

Jellycatspyjamas · 12/01/2021 13:00

There is only limited budgets and our grandchildren are going to paying for this for rest of their lives.

I’m paying for it now. Those grandchildren will be in a much better place to work abd pay taxes if we accept that children shouldn’t live in poverty and vote accordingly instead of defending private companies providing a public service while pocketing £25 out of £30.

Nohomemadecandles · 12/01/2021 13:00

@LegoPirateMonkey and they only nibble the sandwich. Hmm

cantdothisnow1 · 12/01/2021 13:00

This ought to be shocking but it is not.

Government gives £2million contract of taxpayers money to mates (no tender process that was transparent).

Said company makes profit and donates £1m of taxpayers money back to Tory Party.

They don't care that they are profiting off poor kids.

CamdenLurker · 12/01/2021 13:01

Do we know that the company - Chartwell? Are actually charging £30 for this or is it just speculation as the vouchers issued previously we £15 a week?

LegoPirateMonkey · 12/01/2021 13:01

@Katyppp the real scandal is the years of austerity that has forced families into poverty to satisfy grotesque right wing ideology. The kind of selfish greed and entitlement that creates a situation where wealthy companies take money intended to feed hungry children as profit for themselves. That’s the scandal.

cabbageking · 12/01/2021 13:02

The £15 is being funded separately via Councils.
Schools are responsible for the contents and value for money.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/01/2021 13:02

Do you really think the catering company is making £20 profit on £30 income for supplying school meals?

I personally didn't say that. They're making some indeterminate amount of profit, as you acknowledged. I don't believe they should be involved if all they're doing is parcels of ingredients for others to cook/prepare at home. They're not actually providing school meals.

Sirzy · 12/01/2021 13:02

To think nobody is so poor as to struggle to feed their family is exceptionally naive.

These vouchers/meals are intended to cover the free school meals that are provided in schools, parents have enough stress at the moment without the added worry about how they are going to replace the regular meal they knew their children would have.

I don’t care about anyone’s personal circumstances, no child is to blame for whatever is going on in the home and no child should be left hungry.

PolkadotsAndMoonbeams · 12/01/2021 13:03

I don't agree with the parcels they've been giving out, but I'm not sure that they were given the contract because they're a party donor — Compass catering is the largest catering conglomerate in the world.

They hold a tonne of contracts, and operate some restaurant chains as well. They're arguably the most obvious choice for this.

WhatWouldPhyllisCraneDo · 12/01/2021 13:03

I am sorry, but no-one is so poor in the UK that they can't afford to feed their kids.

I presume this is a joke???

mimi0708 · 12/01/2021 13:03

@Katyppp

To be honest, i look at threads like this and wonder when the Government became responsible for feeding children? And when did people become so entitled that they expected it? And complained because it wasn't enough? I have really struggled financially in the past, and i have never come anywhere near letting my children go hungry, ever. I am sorry, but no-one is so poor in the UK that they can't afford to feed their kids. There may be very specific situations when cash is tight, for example waiting for UC or fleeing domestic abuse, but widespread inability to afford food on a daily basis is a budgeting issue. It suits the left-wing narrative to promote food poverty, as seen on here, along with the usual juvenile comments about Tories helping their mates out. I agree there is not enough food to justify the £30 bill, that's obvious. But the real scandal is that the whole expectation of free food was there in the first place.
Wow denying food poverty. Good for you, you must be living a good life/ in your own bubble.
AWeeBit · 12/01/2021 13:03

@Katyppp

To be honest, i look at threads like this and wonder when the Government became responsible for feeding children? And when did people become so entitled that they expected it? And complained because it wasn't enough? I have really struggled financially in the past, and i have never come anywhere near letting my children go hungry, ever. I am sorry, but no-one is so poor in the UK that they can't afford to feed their kids. There may be very specific situations when cash is tight, for example waiting for UC or fleeing domestic abuse, but widespread inability to afford food on a daily basis is a budgeting issue. It suits the left-wing narrative to promote food poverty, as seen on here, along with the usual juvenile comments about Tories helping their mates out. I agree there is not enough food to justify the £30 bill, that's obvious. But the real scandal is that the whole expectation of free food was there in the first place.
Perfect example of someone refusing to even engage with facts.
LegoPirateMonkey · 12/01/2021 13:04

@CamdenLurker these boxes are intended to provide ten lunches - two weeks worth of school meals. 2 x £15 = £30.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/01/2021 13:05

Arguably the most obvious choice is not to think catering companies giving people a few ingredients to prepare their own lunches at home are a better model than giving people top up funds or vouchers.

malificent7 · 12/01/2021 13:06

Katy pp...is your sirname Hopkins?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/01/2021 13:06

It's ridiculous to expect a loaf of bread to last a fortnight. Or not to supply anything to spread on it.

LucilleTheVampireBat · 12/01/2021 13:06

Oh god, the MN competitive under eating has started

I was just about to say this. How absolutely low can people be to choose this particular thread as a platform to brag about how little they eat. I have lost all faith in this site, and people in general really. It's shameful.

malificent7 · 12/01/2021 13:06

Surname*

Porcupineintherough · 12/01/2021 13:06

Well I must have the wrong type of child because theyve just scarfed a large bowl of lentil soup, 2 slices of bread, a slice of cake and a piece of fruit and are still sniffing around for more. They are 13 and 15 and both at the bottom of the healthy weight range for their heights. Luckily I'm not reliant on the pitiful offering outlined above to feed them.

Mrsjayy · 12/01/2021 13:07

To be honest, i look at threads like this and wonder when the Government became responsible for feeding children?
And when did people become so entitled that they expected it? And complained because it wasn't enough?

There has been free school dinners for as long as I can remember I got them for a few years in the 70s my children got them for a year or so in and 90s and now we are in a pandemic where children are being homeschooled and yes those children are still entitled to free school meals.your post is either showing your ignorance of privilege im not sure which!

Katyppp · 12/01/2021 13:07

I don't think i am naive at all.
I think accepting that people can't afford to feed their own children without asking why is naive.