Every time I try to make this point on a thread it gets swept away under ‘hungry kids’, ‘starving kids’, sad faces and highly emotive language.
Sometimes, well meaning schemes can actually be anything but.
To look at this less emotively than ‘evil tories’, the conservative view of the world tends towards a small state, minimal interference. That’s not quite where I am. But I do believe that for the most part people have the right to raise their children as they see fit.
Now sometimes that inevitably means a parent might do something that some of you deem ‘wrong’: they might teach their child about a religion you don’t believe in or they might be stricter than you or more liberal than you. But families are what society is structured on and too much interference isn’t good.
I have spent years teaching in an area that is generally considered to be ‘deprived.’ I know there’s not a lot of money and I know a lot of the children come from families who will have really struggled over lockdown, it’s a tourist area. Looking down my Y8 class register I can see 6 kids who aren’t PP.
Their parents still really love their kids.
So they might eat what some MNetters would deem a ‘poor diet.’ Probably too much fat and sugar and not enough complex carbs and fresh veg.
IMO it isn’t the FSM vouchers that are needed. The biggie is debt tbh. Christmas comes, because these parents are automatically neglectful because you know ... benefits, must be, or something ... are desperate for their kids to have a good Christmas and they will overspend. And get into debt to fund this. Local high street is sinking under the weight of pawn shops, gambling dens, those short term loan places.
IME a parent who ‘won’t provide meals for their child’ (which incidentally is rather more respectful than ‘feed their kid’) is a rare breed and TBH if a child is starving, as in, there was no dinner last night and no breakfast the following morning, some sort of intervention is needed. But it’s unusual.
Mostly parents will do anything to avoid their kid missing out, they’ll go hungry themselves or get into debt.
Whatever some of you want to think, these aren’t Victorian times. We are in the 21st century and we have a 21st century set of problems and sue me but I agree with BB. I think the hysteria over these vouchers utterly misses the point and the money would be better spent elsewhere.