[quote TheFormerPorpentinaScamander]@WitchesGlove I have lived off value beans and bread in the past so my dc can eat! In fact at one point I was eating so little I almost fainted in the middle of church.
As I have explained to someone else I can only post from my experience. I have never been a single adult on benefits, I'm sure its not an easy life, but if it was only me I could certainly spend a lot less on food/rent/heating.
But the post of mine which you originally quoted was in response to people claiming that Carole ( other names are available) at the school gate gets more in benefits than they do in wages. Therefore what a single adult with no dependents gets is irrelevant because Carole obviously does have children.
Having been a parent who has worked part time, full time and not at all, I was always better off working. The more i worked the better off I was. The only time this isn't true is if you or your child are disabled. Then you might be better off on benefits (having not been in that situation I wouldn't know).[/quote]
Well, that’s strange.
I don’t know how long ago it was, when you were working full time/ part time etc, but under Blair’s govt, single parents only had to work 16 hours and a couple 30 between them, to qualify for £££ in benefits. Many said there was no point working/ working full time. Oh and, no cap on housing benefit, so you could pick an expensive area of London to live in if you wanted!
Maybe you should have had more kids and you’d have had enough money, the 2 child cap didn’t come in until 2017