This is an interesting post in that recently I've heard several family members say recently that we can't trust the BBC. Now it's coming up here by the OP (amongst other sources not to trust).
The first time I heard it, it was my 22 yr old DN who said he read this on FB and it was because they hid the Jimmy Saville story. I told him never to get his news from FB. Read across several media for a balanced view. Then I heard it again from another friend and wondered what was going on?
My 'consipiracy theory' is that DC is posting these stories on FB so we just all roll over and accept it when the gov't revokes the BBC licence.
Hoping that we all forget that Murdoch has been campaigning against the BBC for years, that Johnson used the townshouse of Andrew Griffith, the CFO for Sky, after winning the leadership bid, as well as appointing him the chief business adviser to Number 10.
Not to mention that DC has been against the BBC for years. When he ran the New Frontiers Foundation he advocated this:
Tories should fire “missile after missile”, since they “could only prosper in the long term by undermining the BBC’s reputation for impartiality, as was happening with CBS in America” – and as president Trump has sought to do with CNN and his constant cries of “fake news”
Think about all of that when deciding who to trust and who not to trust. If we turn away from trusted news sources (media companies bound by law to report facts) then we become so much more malleable. So what's in it for them? UK Column get money. DC and the current gov't get power with fewer avenues of accountability.
This is all so worrying.