You can say they're underfunded (which they are) and you can say they are struggling due to budget cuts (which they are) but how do you explain how shit they are when you do get through?
Surely it should be, 'the bar is really high to get seen, it took 8 months to get seen, but my god, when we got there the counsellor was fantastic'
Instead of 'bar is high, 8 months to get seen, and shit counsellor, nothing has changed'
I don't understand. Are we not paying or seeking out good quality qualified counsellors due to lack of funding? What sort of training goes into it?
I work in a school, referring children is very difficult, some really REALLY need to be seen, and then when they are, the help is not good enough. I think we do a better job of listening to them/helping them TBH.
I think given the amount of mental health issues there are, having a bigger and better pastoral team within school means they could get access straight away. Obviously need the budget for that too though.