I find it very odd when people say that after Cummings going rogue, lockdown was finished for them.
Why would what someone else does, especially someone like Cummings, have so much impact on their behaviour, can't they think for themselves?
Of course in small ways it's impossible to enforce the lockdown, but I imagine that's taken into consideration when the government introduce these new guidelines, it will be calculated into the risks levels that a percentage of people will go beyond what they have said is now permissible.
The government would be pretty naive to assume everyone is going to keep everything to the letter.
However, we're still very limited in the ways we can ignore the advice.
There are no pubs or restaurants open, so no going to a pub or restaurant and sitting too close to the people at the next table or crowding four deep at the bar.
No theatres or cinemas open so no sitting next to any strangers while you watch a film when you should be 2 metre apart.
Going to the few shops that are able to open is going to be pretty joyless from the sound of it: queuing to get into each shop, only so many people in a shop at a time, one way systems, no trying anything on; couldn't be assed personally. I'm finding shopping online is working very well for me at the moment.
I go to the supermarket because I have to buy food. That's a miserable enough experience as it is, can't say I want to replicate it in any other sort of shop - I accidentally walked the wrong way down an aisle in the supermarket last time I was there, the looks I got you'd have thought I was kicking a kitten down the bloody aisle.
Apart from the large gatherings of protesters we're seeing at the moment and the huge crowds on beaches and other tourist spots, most people will only be breaking the new guidelines in a very small way and some people will still be sticking to them, even if that's because, like me, they can't be bothered to do otherwise.