I don't know where to start with Hake, so I won't.
Tunnock, good luck.
I'm returning to a previous poster's point: a mass loan of tablets, system wide, would have gone a long way to alleviate the inequality.
In some schools, teaching time will not be limited by the need for social distancing because they will teach half a class in school one day, live-streaming to the other half, and alternate.
Obviously, you can only do that if the children at home have access.
You then don't have to limit teaching time - you still have enough specialist teachers to teach in secondary, and enough teachers full stop in primary.
And you have enough space.
Of course, it helps if you have smaller class sizes to start with.
Realistically, even when schools are fully open, in secondary in particular, children are going to have fewer teaching hours in most, not all, secondary schools.
But they will be sitting the same exams.
This could have been planned for and remedied.
This is a choice, made by the government, for our children.
It's not fair.
It is far less fair than anything we have yet experienced in education.
It is also more far-reaching.
As I keep saying, we've had inequality, and schools have been quite adept at mitigating the worst of it - but this is going to be inequality across most of the state sector and at a very high level.
Any child sitting public exams next year is either going to benefit (a few) or lose out because of it.
It's a whole different level of unfair.