@titbumwillypoo
...the problem is free market ideas like that do nothing for the disabled or less academic. You could argue that employers insistence on a degree is flawed as many people can do a job much better because of experience rather than a bit of paper that says they can do it in theory.
Although I find the voucher scheme theoretically attractive, I can see all the arguments against in IN NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES when schools are providing an adequate education. Now that they are not providing anything approximating an adequate education and may not be for months so we are relying entirely on 'amateur' parents to educate, the parents should at least be given financial support to do so and buy in e.g. online tuition, where appropriate.
@StaffAssociationRepresentative
I think that would lead to a huge attainment gap.
And the current situation of relying mostly on parents to educate for the next few months won't? Better to give parents some money to do it so they have more resources to educate, especially if we may be looking at further lockdowns in future.
@Aveisenim
I get your point about funding, however a lot of home ed parents argue against funding because it would come with strings attached and interfere with the education their children receive.
I understand this argument in normal times, but suspect that those of us who are 'reluctant' home educators (i.e. we'd rather outsource to schools but can't) and aren't home educating for political or ideological reasons wouldn't care. After all, we happily send our children to 'one size fits all' warehouse schools everyday on the basis that, while it might not be ideal for them, most children are usually fairly adaptable.
It's all the above posters who have said it, not me
. It's the parents' legal responsibility to educate. So back it up with the cash.
If schools are going to remain closed/at half capacity for months on end and essentially provide a "non-education" (as many posters have argued here as an argument against schools reopening), parents should have the freedom (and the funds) to choose a different option. A portion of the £4,700 spent per year per primary pupil and £6,200 spent per secondary pupil would buy a fair amount of online tuition.
Truth is, schools are the cheapest/most convenient way for us all to discharge our educational responsibilities. But they can't expect to receive money indefinitely for a service they're not providing (similarly to nurseries and childminders, who also face social-distancing issues).