Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is it now time for an 'English' government?

94 replies

Plannergirl9 · 11/05/2020 14:12

The UK government has just published its strategy for coming out of lockdown. However the vast majority of the strategy is for England only.

Boris is the Prime Minister of the UK but is also the leader of the government in England even though it doesn't legally exist as England doesn't have devolution. Matt Hancock is the health Secretary for England only. Dominic Rabb however is the first secretary of state for the UK as defence minister.

Given some of the confusion about the changes in guidance announced yesterday and MSM not being wholey clear the changes are for England only, surely it is time to look to have a bit more distinction between both of Boris's roles and the powers he has for England only.

I am from Scotland and whilst I believe in a federal uk this isn't a thread about Scottish independence.

OP posts:
Likethebattle · 11/05/2020 14:31

Well since health is devolved it’s controlled under the Scottish Government but the UK government control certain things uk wide.

SB1189 · 11/05/2020 14:35

Yes yes yes! A thousand times yes!

The same powers should be devolved to regional parliaments in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland with things like defence and international affairs left to Westminster.

It’s about bloody time. It’s a joke of a system right now!

I hate that Scotland has its own parliament but there’s regional devolution in England....if you happen to live in the right place i.e. a big city.

Plannergirl9 · 11/05/2020 15:10

Likethebattle absolutely the UK government are responsible for UK wide issues such as defence, foreign policy.

I think people forget scotland isn't the only devolved nation.

OP posts:
Plannergirl9 · 11/05/2020 15:13

SB1189 England should have the same type of devolution as the other nations, why should it have any less.

Having a federal uk would be much better.

OP posts:
Blanca87 · 11/05/2020 15:14

I do think it's crazy England is the only country in the four nations that doesn't have its own parliament. I really think it should.

Margaritatime · 11/05/2020 15:53

Absolutely

Haffiana · 11/05/2020 16:15

I want a London government. The rest of the country can face Brexit and recession, and London can stay in the EU as it overwhelmingly voted to.

justmyview · 11/05/2020 16:34

I agree. It should be more clear which legislation / guidance refers to which jurisdiction

Also, it's unfair that Scottish and other MPs vote in Westminster on English issues. This is referred to as "The West Lothian question"
www.newstatesman.com/politics/2014/09/what-west-lothian-question

paniquer · 11/05/2020 16:43

justmyview that was why David Cameron introduced "EVEL" after the Scottish Referendum.

www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/bills/public/english-votes-for-english-laws/

Dreamersandwishers · 11/05/2020 16:49

To be honest I would be happy to get rid of the devolved Scottish government ( would not speak for other nations). It’s a huge extra layer of cost, it’s parochial in the extreme, and it’s about as relevant to those of us outside the Central Belt, as London is.
In my neck of the woods we rejected independence and we rejected Brexit, so we are not represented well at the present time.

VimtoCordial · 11/05/2020 16:49

Yes, of course. It's times like this you see how inefficient the current system is. The UK Government is currently speaking only to England because health is devolved to the other three nations. Of course England needs its own parliament, and for the UK to operate in a very small parliament for UK matters.

Federalism won't work in the current setup because England is just too big. If England split into regional bases it could work.

However, it will never happen and I think eventually Scotland, then Wales, then Northern Ireland will go their own ways. By that time, Cornwall may have joined them.

I think the UK has a maximum of a twenty year shelf life left.

Dreamersandwishers · 11/05/2020 16:50

By the way, totally agree,Scottish MPs have no business voting on English issues and they should recuse themselves.

SkelingtonArgument · 11/05/2020 16:50

An English parliament would just mean more politicians with their snouts in the gravy trough. A complete waste of money.

It’s bad enough living somewhere which now has a mayor for the county which has been declared a unitary authority - although my city votes labour, the county is overwhelmingly Tory so we got a Tory mayor. As far as I can see, the mayor has cost thousands and done nothing except spout hot air.
The Police and Crime Commissioner is another political appointment which achieves nothing and yet again is a Tory snout in the publicly funded trough

newyearnoeu · 11/05/2020 16:50

Haffiana - you do realise it wasn't just london that voted remain for Brexit, right? All four capital cities of UK voted remain plus a number of other areas.
And also some areas of London voted leave.
So can somewhere like Edinburgh replace Dagenham in your London only EU-remaining government?
What a stupid post.

VimtoCordial · 11/05/2020 16:53

In my neck of the woods we rejected independence and we rejected Brexit, so we are not represented well at the present time.

What do you mean? Independence didn't happen so if you're against it then you've got what you wanted, surely.

MrsJoshNavidi · 11/05/2020 16:56

The time for devolved government for England was time ago. It's way overdue.
I think we never went down that route for fear it would break up England. I can see Yorkshire, the Midlands, the South West, and London, and other areas too promoting a case for local government.

VimtoCordial · 11/05/2020 16:57

By the way, totally agree,Scottish MPs have no business voting on English issues and they should recuse themselves.

Before EVEL SNP MPs did exactly that. Since EVEL all Scottish MPs don't vote on English matters.

I don't live in Scotland and have no particular opinion as to what Scotland could do re: government/indpendence. (Other than feeling the current UK set up is helping none of the countries within its remit.)

emz771 · 11/05/2020 17:01

I would love to see Scotland et independence - they would sink without our money.

VimtoCordial · 11/05/2020 17:01

An English parliament would just mean more politicians with their snouts in the gravy trough. A complete waste of money.

I don't think so. Scottish, Welsh and NI MPs would disappear. English MPs would be in the English Parliament, and all of them could come together as a small micro UK Parliament on matters that go across all four nations. So you'd still be upwards of 80-100 MPs down.

Haffiana · 11/05/2020 17:03

What a stupid post.

Other parts of the country can choose to go their own way towards devolution or not. Up to them. In London there are a lot of people who want separation. Given that we are going to have a massive recession, there will be a huge cry for London to devolve. Many want it already as we are not represented by the current parliament.

PerplexingWords · 11/05/2020 17:03

Boris was not at all happy at that suggestion during PMQs. 😂

VimtoCordial · 11/05/2020 17:03

I would love to see Scotland et independence - they would sink without our money.

This doesn't make sense. They put the money in the pot just like everyone else, get some of it back to do all the devolved stuff, and the UK government keeps the rest to deal with UK wide projects etc.

emz771 · 11/05/2020 17:04

It makes perfect sense - London subsides the UK in terms of tax. 35% of all UK tax comes from ones city.

If that jumped out Krankie doesn’t want to be part of us. Ta ta.

StoorieHoose · 11/05/2020 17:07

Well aren't you a fucking delight @emz771. Hope you have a nice big port to keep your nuclear weapon when it happens? Alternatively we could rent you Faslane for a couple of billion a year

CuriousaboutSamphire · 11/05/2020 17:08

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't one of the reasons we don't have because the Scottish government insisted on being able to vote on the equivalent of devolved areas in England?

I'm sure I remember some really frothy threads be on it a few years ago!