Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think single-use PPE is terrible for the environment

145 replies

Lycidas · 18/04/2020 16:33

Apparently 55,000 items of PPE will only last eight hours in the UK...with this situation due to continue for many months at least. Is there really no alternative that’s not as wasteful and environmentally damaging?

OP posts:
SomeHalfHumanCreatureThing · 18/04/2020 16:34
Hmm

Well of course it is, but there's not really another choice atm, is there

cardibach · 18/04/2020 16:35

It’s less damaging for my environment than loads of people I know dying due to cross contamination.

RoryGilmoree · 18/04/2020 16:36

Yes. Waste from the nhs is huge anyway but you've probably never thought about that. Would you rather your loved ones die?

Imapotato · 18/04/2020 16:36

What your plan then?

Imapotato · 18/04/2020 16:36

Sorry. What’s.

PinkiOcelot · 18/04/2020 16:37

Really?!! Are you being fucking serious?

The environment is getting a break from emissions etc!! FFS!!

ChestyNut · 18/04/2020 16:37
Biscuit
TheQueef · 18/04/2020 16:37

Not as bad as Covid is for the population Hmm

Lycidas · 18/04/2020 16:37

I don’t understand why there can’t be gowns blasted and washed at high temperatures.

OP posts:
Trees2905 · 18/04/2020 16:38

Honest to god some people

BogRollBOGOF · 18/04/2020 16:39

It is, but at least the environment is benefiting from far fewer single use items such as coffee cup, party bag novelties and reduced air pollution from car use and industrial production.

PPE is of more social benefit in its short lifespan than a coffee cup.

GoingtotheWinchester · 18/04/2020 16:39

Reuseable PPE would definitely be an amazing invention but it’s not likely to get invented this side of Christmas so for the moment we need to carry on disposing of it.

Abreadsandwich · 18/04/2020 16:39

It's not great but since PPE is in short supply it's really a necessity.
Lots of other stuff about corona has been better for the environment. Most airlines have grounded their planes, less travel by all modes of transport. Industry halted so far less pollution there. Far fewer people buying takeaway coffees in disposable cups, or prepackaged sandwiches, bottles of water etc
I'm sure there are more.
That doesnt make the single use plastic problem disappear but I'm not sure there are affordable or plentiful alternatives?

CandyLeBonBon · 18/04/2020 16:41

There's always one!

Floraflower3 · 18/04/2020 16:42

I do agree with the sentiment of why don't we have reusable PPE that can be washed at high temps. Are visors and goggles sterilizable?

misskatamari · 18/04/2020 16:43

Of course it is, but there isn't really an alternative is there. And I don't think creating reuseable PPE is exactly top priority at the moment is it!

Oysterbabe · 18/04/2020 16:43

People dying would be the better for the environment option. That's a tough sell.

cacaca · 18/04/2020 16:43

Not really the time to be concerned about this is it. The virus is not good for the planet lets be more concerned about that.

Lycidas · 18/04/2020 16:44

It also just seems unsustainable. You really think that with so many large economies competing inviting for PPE, that struggling countries will be able to source any for themselves? It seems like more effort should be directed towards creating safe and reusable PPE.

OP posts:
Pipandmum · 18/04/2020 16:44

Laundering would also have an environmental impact. It's not great, but this is an exceptional time, and maybe in future more sustainable solutions could be found.

saraclara · 18/04/2020 16:46

It's very simple. The materials used in order to prevent molecules as tiny as viruses passing through, are not safely washable.

There is simply no alternative.

Waffles80 · 18/04/2020 16:47

Fuck that.

I’m massively, massively into protecting the environment and hardly use any plastic.

But you are utterly insane if you think reusable PPE should be considered at all. How dare you suggest front line workers should put themselves at risk.

helpfulperson · 18/04/2020 16:47

dependig on the type and make visors and goggles are sterlisable and reusable. There are also resusable masks but they are not designed to be worn for multiple 8 hr shifts. We use them in industrial settings but I'm not aware of them being used in medical circumstances. They are looking at sterilising some of the gowns as well.

This is why we need to be so careful about the media stories about resuse of PPE. In some cases it is perfectly possible and in others it isn't. The media would have you believe any reuse is bad.

titchy · 18/04/2020 16:49

You have to balance practicalities and cost (including environmental - washing at 90 uses electricity you know...). Throwing away small items such as gloves and thin plastic aprons is practical - think of the alternative. Robust gloves that survive multiple washes that you can't actually use in a clinical setting because they're too bulky. Storage and extra washing facilities for plastic gowns made out of material so thick, to survive continuous washing, the same amount of plastic would have made 100 disposable gowns.

Plenty of clinical equipment and I dare say some ppe is re-used (E.g. visors) but it's not as simple as you'd like to think for a lot of it.

Lycidas · 18/04/2020 16:50

@Waffles80

Yes but as long as we have the PPE that we need in the UK, who cares if other countries are getting screwed over? Because that’s exactly what you’re suggesting. There is no way that is the global demand is going to be met through the current system. So make sure that our doctors are safe, but others don’t matter. Like I said it’s not sustainable at least for the short term.

OP posts: