*On Thursday, Flavia Petrini, the president of the Italian College of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, said her group had issued guidelines on what to do in a period that bordered on wartime “catastrophe medicine.”
“In a context of grave shortage of health resources,” the guidelines say, intensive care should be given to “patients with the best chance of success” and those with the “best hope of life” should be prioritized.
The guidelines also say that in “in the interests of maximizing benefits for the largest number,” limits could be put on intensive care units to reserve scarce resources to those who have, first, “greater likelihood of survival and secondly who have more potential years of life.”*
They're also deciding between who has more potential years of life. So a 50 year old will be deemed more "worthy" of saving than a 70 year old, for example. And if the UK doesn't get a grip on this the NHS will reach a point where they have to make choices based on who is more worthy to save.
The decision won't be based on vaccinations, of course. But unfortunately, an 80 year old father and grandfather will be deemed less worthy than a 30 year old for example.