I'm getting really confused about where the nurseries priorities are tbh- my Dd1 started nursery in September- was expecting the bugs to be caught, but over 3 months she caught a cold, then developed a virus, then it mutated into a broncolitis.....we still kept paying for her place but deferred her after the broncolitis until January.
For info, luckily I'm still a SAHM with Dd2, so if Dd1 is a 'bit off' im more likely to keep her home other than send her in unwell. Fine with a runny nose, but temp etc, I'd rather keep her home, especially after the A&E trip with a chest infection.
She was fully fit going back, but after two days, runny nose and temperature, so a few days off. Then I got a phone call about her attendance- I explained all of this and was then told they were constantly chasing working parents to pick up their children going in with 39* temps, but also had to insist that children who were funded attended whether they were sick or not or they wouldn't get paid by the council!?? So attendance of places was totally biased- basically bring your children no matter how sick so we can stamp and receive payment for the funded places, and parents who worked who had to bring in their sick children were allowed to.
I chose to send Dd1 there, I pay for her to go 3 afternoons a week, it gives me some 1 on 1 time with Dd2 (theres only 15 months between them) and allows Dd1 to spend some quality time (it is a great nursery on what they teach/outdoor based etc) with children her age.
But every month I receive send to all emails chasing payments 'in advance', not one about 'if your child is unwell, has a virus or temp over 38* keep them home'-
Yes, bugs will be caught, and obviously it's good to build up an immunity, but viral infections versus the nursery getting paid, money seems paramount.
I get the 'this is a nut free zone' email weekly, how about the 'infectious viruses' one!?
(Apologies for the rant, but it costing a fortune for my Dd1 to basically get sick right now, I didnt appreciate a phone call 'telling me off' for keeping her home with a bug- then being told there were 'double standards' for funded v private places- seemed like discrimination to me)