DH's sister is getting married this summer in a fancy hotel about 30 mins drive from our house. The wedding is on a Monday, so DH is taking the day off but will be in work the next day. DS (5) will also be in school the next day.
DH's other sisters are planning to stay over at the hotel after the wedding. DH thinks we should too - not because he wants to, but because he thinks he'll look antisocial if we don't. I'm not keen, for various reasons, mainly the cost - it's going to cost several hundred pounds for the 4 of us (we could afford it, but it would mean going without in a few other areas, and scaling back our holiday plans) - and because I don't really see any advantage in staying.
Personally I think that, bearing in mind that DH has to go to work and DS to school the next day, it would be best for me to bring the kids home early(ish) and get them to bed (they are 5 and 3, and the 5yo in particular is not great when he hasn't slept), and then DH can stay as late as he likes and either share a lift home or get a taxi.
We would have to leave the hotel at about 7am anyway for DH to get to work on time, so it's not like we'd get to laze around and enjoy the facilities. The kids will be unsettled being somewhere different, plus we'll have to bring change of clothes etc to the wedding in order to stay over.
If DH was really keen to stay over, I wouldn't mind so much, but it's entirely because the others are and he doesn't want to appear unsociable.
Neither of us are big drinkers, so that's not an issue (one of us will have to stay sober anyway, since we have the kids with us and also one of us will be driving the next morning either way).
So, am I being unreasonable to say no to staying over?