TimeAfterTimeAfter
Yeah I get this.
On the one hand the sheer number of victims at the hands of this one man means that it was always going to be reported in terms of hyperbole and something must be done.
On the other, your man the taxi driver is thought to have raped at least a hundred women and he was bloody up for parole.*
This is how I feel. The men this man attacked have faced a horrendous ordeal, and I think it's right and good that the crimes are being treated seriously by the courts and the media. A 30 year minimum tariff is appropriate, and it's good that this man won't be eligible for release until 2050.
But Worbuoys was also found guilty of huge nunbers of rapes and is considered by the police to have attacked 100s of women. Yet he got a minimum tariff of just 8 years and was going to be released last year until a massive outcry by the public stopped it going ahead.
I don't want male victims to be dismissed, or crimes against men to be minimised, I just want crimes against women to be treated with the same seriousness and for female victims to get the same empathy.
If a woman goes back to a man's flat, there is a sizeable chunk of the population who will hold her at least partially responsible for whatever happens to her there. Whereas with this case, I haven't seen a single comment like that online No-one is outing the male victims and calling them whores.
I don't want male victims to be blamed, but the stark difference in public response makes the blaming of female victims all the more obvious and painful to me.