I have realised that I am becoming increasingly irritated by a specific brand of non-confrontational person that seems to be unable to deal with any kind of disagreement in a mature or effective way. Their reluctance to confront a situation can just lead to the other parties involved doing all the work to resolve an issue and having to coax the non-confrontational person to actually engage in the process of resolution can be incredibly frustrating.
I guess the thing that really winds me up is these people view their non-confrontational nature as a positive and as a sign that they are just too "nice" to engage in disagreements. This would be easier to accept if the same people weren't engaging in passive aggressive behaviour or weren't busy trying to characterise the people actually trying to sort the issue out as the bad guys and themselves as the victims.
So AIBU to say that actually being non-confrontational isn't a positive trait and sometimes it's essential that everyone is able to confront issues or deal with disagreements when the needs arises?