OP just another example of you not really getting to point;
OP; @carolinelucaseshandbag
You said
An organisation should reflect the population in general. If 2% of the population identifies as LGBT but only 0.1 % of uni applications are from this group, then they can work towards ensuring this is not due to unconscious discrimination etc.
What are you not getting here?!!
But....
If no one states their sexuality on their application and just gets a place offered on merit alone then there is no way they could possibly be discriminating is there?
Are you suggesting they would offer places to LGBTQ+ applicants, who may not warrant a place on merit, just to get their percentages up?
If an application didn’t require you to state your colour, religion, gender etc...they could never be guilty of discriminating, which is why they advise you to not put your age on your CV these days so they can’t be ageist."
There are many reasons why institutions may have unconscious bias / discrimination against minority groups. For example, lack of active LGBTQ groups on campus, a reputation for not supporting BAME students, a number of old hard ti access buildings. Therefore people from those communities may avoid applying to those. Without this data, how would the uni know? Do you really think discrimination/ equality is just "we are colour / disability / sexuality blind"? Our society is much more nuanced than that. Luckily it's recognised, and data is collected to try and address this. If your daughter does lead her life as a gay/ bi woman, this is a positive. It's recognising her existence and her needs. Well not hers specifically before you get paranoid 