@RightYesButNo I’d prefer to see much more detailed research statistically analysing what was in the plan, vs what were the reasons given for dissatisfaction.
I really wanted a water birth (not just pain relief - to birth in the pool too). I swam almost every day in pregnancy, the day I had my IVF blastocyst transfer I drove to the beach to watch the waves for hours. Swimming was a big part of my pregnancy, emotionally.
On the day, my MW read my plan and said “OK, we have a pool free, the decision is yours and I will support you using it. However, your 9cm on arrival and I think this baby is coming very very soon. You clearly don’t need it now for pain relief in early labour, so it’s all about the birth. You have some bleeding that I’d like to keep an eye on honestly that’s going to be harder for me to do if you’re in the water. What do you think?”
I said - let’s crack on, on dry land then. And I had a very positive experience.
But if she’d said dismissively “oh you’re too far gone for it to be filled in time” or worse “we’ve had to close 3 of our water rooms because of funding cuts” then I’d have reported a high level of dissatisfaction.
I’m interested what they mean by dissatisfaction. My one area of dissatisfaction was a MW on the phone saying “it’s too soon, you can’t come in in a very dismissive war. My NCT leader had told us that one ‘test’ was if you could talk through a contraction, you weren’t ready to come in. I actually deliberately paused and puffed on the phone. I actually spoke ALL through ever contraction - my delivering MW kept taking the piss about it!
Anyway, as above, I came in anyway - and was 9cm on arrival. I would report a level of dissatisfaction because of that.
So in research, I’d rather see an analysis that breaks down: birth plan ‘realism’ (e.g. reference to flexibility), reason for dissatisfaction, and an assessment of feelings about that dissatisfaction.
I still remember being dismissed by the front desk MW - but it didn’t change how I felt about my labour.