YANBU OP.
Please forgive me for pasting my response to a similar thread below. I’m just tired of seeing the same defeatist arguments about how the NHS is a wasteful, inefficient black hole that doesn’t deserve more funding.
The reason the US healthcare system keeps being mentioned is that the proposed US-UK trade deal would move the NHS closer to the US healthcare model.
The UK spends less per capita on healthcare than most other developed countries. According to OECD data from 2016 (the most recent year available), the UK spent $4,192 USD per capita that year.
Let’s compare that to some of the other countries mentioned on this thread. France spent $4,600 on healthcare per capita. Australia spent $4,708, Belgium $4,840, the Netherlands $5,385, Germany $5,551 and Switzerland $7,919. The bloated US system spent $9,892 per capita and the USA still manages to have a significantly lower average life expectancy than the UK.
Other countries spending more per capita on healthcare than the UK are Luxembourg, Norway, Ireland, Sweden, Austria, Denmark, Canada, Japan and Iceland.
You can see more data at stats.oecd.org. I’d have liked to post a table, but the formatting went awry.