I may have posted about this before but I really need to know if what I want to do is unreasonable.
DS is 12 and DD is 10.
Ex lives in the far south of the city, doesn't drive. DC and I live in the far north. I do drive.
Wednesdays are a sodding nightmare. DS has a dance class about half way between us, so I drop her, then drop DS at dad's, go back to dance class to wait, then collect DS from dad's. Then sit in the bloody rush hour traffic. Sat nav/theaa.com says the journey between the two should take 20 minutes. We'll I've just spent 1hr and 20 minutes doing that sodding journey. DD was half an hour late for youth club and DS was 15 minutes late for sport training.
DS already doesn't want to see him (I have definitely posted about that and thus far, he's been quiet) but do I HAVE to sit in the fucking awful traffic to facilitate DS seeing his dad for 1.5 hours on a Wednesday after school? DS has said he doesn't want to give up sport. DD definitely doesn't want to give up youth club and doesn't see why she should for her brother to see dad.
There is no other evening in the week we can get over there, so many other after school clubs/my work/homework to do.
He sees DS EOW (although has now made those visits shorter as his gf has moved to a town 50 miles away and its inconvenient for her to be dropping off DS at 7pm on Sunday evening so they drop home about 2. 30pm now).
He moans he doesn't see enough of them.
Would I be unreasonable to tell him to book snd pay for a taxi? Or must I continue to take DS to him?