@hazeyjane
This whole privatisation aspect is overblown. There are some aspects of NHS healthcare which have to have private providers and as has already been outlined, in fact always have been under governments of any persuasion.
The problem is using the NHS as a political football. It is about the only one that labour can identify as a possible line of attack as they are so useless as an opposition and anti Semitic that they will never have a chance of getting elected. Hence why this morning it is reported that even if Corbyn agrees to vote for an election, over half his MPs will rebel in fear of losing their seats. Unfortunately the ones that will probably survive will no doubt be the ones that have large majorities and propagate this awful anti semitism.
However, to return to the point, there are some aspects whereby private provision in my view has been wrong, not good value and in some cases as a result of unintended consequences.
For example, PFI. Building hospitals under this scheme is a scandal. Costs multiple times that if it was contracted directly by the government instead of a stupid puffed up lease scheme which then costs millions to implement minor changes to a building. Even changing a lightbulb cost ridiculous amounts.I believe that no new ones are being commissioned under PFI but the legacy will continue for years for which we as taxpayers will foot the bill.
Higher use of private providers for operations. Nice service for patients, but why did it happen? Because George Osborne continued on the Labour scam of screwing in essence public sector pensions. As a result hospital consultants stopped working additional hours due to the tax implications and the ones who could work in the private sector using those additional hours previously used in the NHS set up limited companies and provided their services through private providers...charging the NHS far more than before. Oh and I do speak from an informed view on this
The provision of health care will only really move forward when politicians stop using it for their own selfish means, and stop the constant reorganisations with each change of government