Tinyteatime the research would suggest that experience of certain circumstances (eg suicide) makes those who've experienced it better able to spot certain markers.
SelfIdentifying - hypervigilance is likely why we're looking but doesn't explain what we see.
But yes my fathers mood could turn in a nanosecond so we all were "on alert" as a result.
My brothers found it useful as a police officer, he wouldn't condemn someone without evidence but it does mean he reads people and situations very quickly, an area he's gone into specialising in but isn't his every day work (dealing with hostage situations) it's particularly useful in.
LumpyPillow well said.
No people shouldn't be accused without evidence BUT I still think people should protect themselves if they feel someone is a threat. It's possible to do that without accusing.
There are far too many get away with appallingly low sentences for despicable crimes because they're good looking/charming/successful it's a disgrace!
"Fuck. Right. Off. I can understand not believing or understanding especially if youve never experienced but that haughty 'oh dear, do try not to belive you have a magical power, dear' tone is beyond gross." Agree, plus I think the majority of us on this thread aren't attributing it to anything supernatural anyway but to subtle cues we're picking up on that are just difficult to quantify/explain
JustABoy - that dilemma came up when friends and I were playing a game that prompted discussions on ethical dilemmas. All the guys said they would cross over/take a slightly different route/pop into a shop or something to delay themselves. To me decent good men are aware of how nervous that can make girls/women. Years later the game came up in discussion with another friends then boyfriend present, he scoffed and said he wouldn't change his route/pace "just so some hysterical woman gets to think they're safer" this couple later split due to Dv. He was a nasty piece of work.
"very much suggests that those who don’t have such feelings and fell victim are somehow in the wrong, when they most definitely are not." I totally disagree, nobody's saying its a character flaw not having such instincts just that like any skill that's not taught some have it and some don't. If you don't that is not anybody's fault.
"And the “follow your instincts” thing can be very dangerous." But it doesn't have to be, you can avoid certain people without accusing them of anything. Ignoring your instincts DOES have potential to be dangerous though.
And nobody supporting the "trust your instincts" stance is suggesting NOT acting cautiously in life generally even if they're not getting that "gut reaction" but a situation is clearly unsafe/has a potential risk factor.