Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

preserving a deceased loved one's tattoo is insane

82 replies

IrishGal21 · 05/05/2019 01:33

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48047002

would you do this and put it on your mantlepiece? Seems to me very morbid and grim

OP posts:
BananasAreTheSourceOfEvil · 05/05/2019 09:15

I dont know tbh, but Ive never seen it before, there is something eerily beautiful about it (but also a bit creepy).

Ill re read it properly later because all I can hear in my head atm is 'It puts the lotion on its skin...'
Confused

Ihatehashtags · 05/05/2019 09:26

Disgusting!!!! It’s up there with keeping the babies umbilical stump and teeth 🤮🤮

PropagandaMachine · 05/05/2019 09:38

... all I can hear in my head atm is 'It puts the lotion on its skin...'

Er, this. I think it's grim and ghoulish, and a photo would suffice. I find the attitude that the recently bereaved should be able to do whatever they like (grieve in their own way) rather strange. As a PP said, what next, taxidermy?

Persimmonn · 05/05/2019 09:48

Sick. If your tattoos have meaning then take a picture. Mutilating a dead body for the sake of selfish reasons and “art” doesn’t sit right with me.

Persimmonn · 05/05/2019 09:57

Just thinking about this. Would the tattoo be passed down the family? It would end up being like Phoebe’s Gladys painting in Friends. Nobody would want it but would feel obliged to keep it. Yuck.

sonjadog · 05/05/2019 10:01

I wonder if those who are against the idea here are all around the same age and remember when Silence of the Lambs came out.

Mrsjayy · 05/05/2019 10:06

Its a bit grim it made me queasy looking at it !

Mrsjayy · 05/05/2019 10:07

Oh yeah it is very Jame Gumb

PropagandaMachine · 05/05/2019 10:08

Well I did see TSOTL at the cinema when it came out sonja but I doubt that informed my or anyone else's opinion.
Skinning your deceased loved ones is just horrific.

HappyMisfit · 05/05/2019 10:15

I’ve had a read and a think...

It’s funny how keeping someone’s skin is “horrific” but keeping their ashes isn’t?

I don’t see the difference personally. I’m ok with it.

PinkCrayon · 05/05/2019 10:31

I dont see any difference to ashes either.
Its also what he requested.

I think each to their own.

BarbarianMum · 05/05/2019 10:36

Well one difference with ashes is that they are generally kept out of sight in an urn. Not usually on a heap on the mantlepiece.

MyBlueMoonbeam · 05/05/2019 10:50

😱

Looks like it belongs in a serial killer's lair to me as well.

There is no accounting for folks though & if it helps the widow with the grieving process I suppose we shouldn't judge.

GinTimeAtHome · 05/05/2019 11:00

Doesn’t bother me, I’d probably do it! But then I don’t find anything about death overly morbid or concerning, and I have come to terms with my own morality. Grief effects people in different ways and if this makes her feel better then who am I to judge.

When my sister died, I took photos of her tattoos and had them tattooed on me 🤷‍♀️ I doubt we could have done this as her skin was so compromised at the end. I also had the tattoo we were going to have done together done!

Going to suggest this to dh and see what he says....

Motheroffeminists · 05/05/2019 17:36

Yep, very serial killer trophy. Why not just pickle his cock in a jar? Or an eyeball if you really loved his eyes? A nipple?

JacquesHammer · 05/05/2019 17:37

Why not just pickle his cock in a jar?

Well his cock is very useful but his tats are far prettier

tierraJ · 05/05/2019 17:43

Just no.
In Buchenwald conc. camp during the war the Kommandant's wife would look for prisoners whose tattoos she liked, she would then have them killed & the tattooed skin was made into lampshades... they were found when the camp was liberated.

tierraJ · 05/05/2019 17:46

For those interested, google Ilse Koch, in the Wikipedia entry there are photos of the lamps etc.

SilverySurfer · 05/05/2019 17:47

I think it's gruesome, as is having ashes made into jewellery.

Doobigetta · 05/05/2019 17:58

No tattoo could possibly mean as much as a loved one’s face, could it? And nobody (I hope) would ever consider having their dead partner’s face preserved and stuck in a box on the mantelpiece- everyone would think that was bizarre and morbid and take it as evidence that the person was in serious need of help. But why is it different and ok to keep other bits of skin?

Saitama · 06/05/2019 00:09

burning a whole body into ashes and keeping it in an urn on your mantelpiece is normal but keeping a part of preserved skin is weird? Hmm

Sybelline · 06/05/2019 00:11

I wouldn't keep ashes and I wouldn't display a loved one's pelt either.

PropagandaMachine · 06/05/2019 09:05

But I don't think anyone in this thread has actually said that keeping ashes is OK, so not sure why it keeps being mentioned!

dudsville · 06/05/2019 09:08

I'm trying to work out why this is abhorrent to me. I have the ashes of loved ones, and i have poked and prodded the ashes, but a display of skin of a loved one... well for one thing it wouldn't go with my decor...

MyBlueMoonbeam · 06/05/2019 09:12

@PropagandaMachine

They have - see page 1 😉