Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Father of my children does not want to marry me!

650 replies

Jessil91 · 26/04/2019 00:55

So my BF of almost ten years who I live with and have two lovely children with does not believe in marriage. This wasn’t made clear to me til a few a days ago when we were for talking about it ( I just kind of assumed we would get married at some point given circumstances). I’ve never been a massive marriage advocate per se but I can’t help but feel really depressed and down about it, like he doesn’t want me or take our relationship seriously. I know that may sound silly since we have children together but I can’t help how I feel. There’s this feeling of rejection, like the man I love doesn’t love me enough to marry me. I communicated this with him and he turned round and said that his not believing in marriage is not personal and that he felt a little offended because I seemed more bothered about marriage then just being with him. But that’s not the case, I just believe in marriage and what it stands for and I want to legalise our relationship. I must add that he’s a great Dad and we have a healthy relationship otherwise.

Am I being stupid??? Any advice would be greatly appreciated !!

OP posts:
hsegfiugseskufh · 27/04/2019 10:47

Im not claiming to be a feminist! Ive already said if this bullshit is feminism i arent interested!

I dont want to bring my children up in a world where youre frowned upon for making a decision that youre totally happy with.

Me keeping my own (or my dads or his dads so yeno more men!) Surname does fuck all for equality. I wont get further in my career being parrot mysurname than i would parrot dhsurname. I wont get taken more seriously for it. It wont do anything for women around the world either.

Please tell me exactly how keeping their own surname actually helps real women in the real world? Like practically.. what changes?

zsazsajuju · 27/04/2019 10:49

Also I don’t see any evidence at all that I have a “dim view of women”. I do have a dim view of misogyny though.

hsegfiugseskufh · 27/04/2019 10:49

I wont become invisible when i take dh surname. I also have no interest in giving my child the surname of an abusive twat i have nothing to do with. What does that do for feminism? Please tell me.

Also can you explain this disappearing because i know plenty of married women who havent changed at all and neither has their life, family or career after changing their surname.

hsegfiugseskufh · 27/04/2019 10:50

You clearly do have a dim view of women because youre constantly using negative language about the ones who make a choice you dont like.

They get "erased" and "disappear" according to you.

hsegfiugseskufh · 27/04/2019 10:52

Feminists have a bad name? Isn’t that what you really think plantpot? Isn’t that why you changed your name if you were really to be honest

Erm.... no. Feminists do get a bad name and i get why. This thread being a really good example.

I didnt change my name to disassociate myself with feminism, no. I did it because i wanted to. I wanted the same name as my dp and child.

woodcutbirds · 27/04/2019 10:54

I mistrust men who say they 'don't believe in marriage.' It is hugely to a woman's advantage to be married to her partner if she has children.The joint finance, pensions, home ownership etc is all clear cut in law, which it isn't for unmarried couples.
Explain this to him. Maybe he doesn't want a big wedding or a big show. You could just get hitched at a register office with the children and two witnesses then go for lunch in a pub. It doesn't have to be a Look At Us festival. If he's still ambivalent, then I;d get your finances organised as soon as possible and make sure you have a healthy savings account and pension set up exclusively in your name.

woodcutbirds · 27/04/2019 10:56

As to changed surnames: I chose DP. I didn't choose my father. I know which man I preferred to be associated with. Until patriarchal surnames are erased, then the logic that taking your husband's name is misogynistic is nonsense.

zsazsajuju · 27/04/2019 10:59

Yeah it’s obvious you are not a feminist and have some negative attitudes there.

You don’t want to bring your children up a society where you are frowned upon for making a decision you are perfectly happy with? Emm, dunno where you are going to live then as there are many decisions you will make that you are perfectly happy with that people will disagree with for one reason or another.

A name is an important part of your identity. Women used to be property of men and are still thought of as having much less value than men (varying of course from place to place). They took men’s names on marriage as slaves took their masters name. Changing your name to your husbands name and failing to have any reference to you in your children’s name is deeply sexist and perpetuates sexist concepts.

You don’t have to be a feminist of course but it is a bit rich to take the benefits feminists have made for you while denigrating the ongoing struggle with your negative comments towards us.

zsazsajuju · 27/04/2019 11:01

You get why feminists have a bad name. That explains your mindset.

hopefulhalf · 27/04/2019 11:04

This thread has moved on, but interesting common themes. DH is the child of a divorce so wasnt keen on marriage and TBH in our late 20's there was a huge rise in status weddings and bridizillas (I blame the Richard Curtis film for glamourising the whole thing) so I wasn't overly bothered and absolutely did not want the white dress, Dad's arm crap. Ds was unplanned and once we had a child together and certainly before we had another one I found myself wanting the legal protection of marriage. I calmly put this to him, suggesting we could do it at the registery office with our parents (if they wanted to be their) and siblings. Like others on this thread he then suddenly wanted to make a bigger deal of it, although still not huge, he wanted to invite aunts, uncles and have a party. I went along with this, but I am interested in this phenomena of men who aren't bothered but then want to do it "properly". Puzzling

Motoko · 27/04/2019 11:04

This thread has been completely derailed, and doesn't apply to OP now.

I'd like to hear how OP has got on after talking to her partner some more.

hopefulhalf · 27/04/2019 11:05

Oh i cheated with the name thing, I am Mrs DHname but professionally and finacially Dr Madienname

SlappingJoffrey · 27/04/2019 11:06

As would I motoko.

MoreSlidingDoors · 27/04/2019 11:07

YET I CHOSE to take DH surname because I wanted to.

What choice did he need to make? How long did you discuss all of the options - you changing, him changing, both of you changing, none of you changing?

Most people don’t consider 3 of those at all, and my friends who name changed are now coming to the realisation that they did it not actually though choice, but through expectation. Is that really okay?

MoreSlidingDoors · 27/04/2019 11:10

Me keeping my own (or my dads or his dads so yeno more men!) Surname does fuck all for equality. I wont get further in my career being parrot mysurname than i would parrot dhsurname. I wont get taken more seriously for it. It wont do anything for women around the world either.

Evidence says otherwise, actually.

I can’t believe how naive you are.

MsTSwift · 27/04/2019 11:13

One positive thing about the ex I didn’t marry was he wanted to take my name
as more interesting than his and my family were nicer than his

hsegfiugseskufh · 27/04/2019 11:16

My surname isnt my identity. I personally associate it with my dad. Who i have nothing to do with. He isn't part of my life.
In fact i resent that i have it.

Youre saying taking dps name says im owned by him. But having my dads doesnt show im owned by him? Why?

Take the benefits feminists have made for me? Like what because apparently its not choice.

Im not naive at all.

Show me the evidence then?

People really take people with miss in front of their name more seriously do they? Not in my experience.

hsegfiugseskufh · 27/04/2019 11:18

Oh and my mindset is that i dont want to be told what to do by anyone.

I have a brain and im capable of making my own decisions about my own life.

MsTSwift · 27/04/2019 11:21

I think we are all conditioned by society and our surroundings far more than we realise.

YouJustDoYou · 27/04/2019 11:28

My surname isnt my identity. I personally associate it with my dad. Who i have nothing to do with. He isn't part of my life.
In fact i resent that i have it

This. It's hilarious when some people bleat on about "keep your surname! You will lose all identity if you don't!!", but it's (typically) your DAD'S name anyway!!! Lmao. Our "maiden" names are typically and historically our father's names. If you're saying our whole identity is based on a male inherited surname, then it would be just the same for children who take on a father's surname. Also, it's very belittling and arrogant to assume any person will "lose their identity" just by changing a name. Names mean different things to different people, and we change them, or not, based on what we feel is best at the time. It's incredibly sad that some people on here feel that they need to dictate and judge people based on what they decide to do about a name. I mean, fgs, they say women are their own worst enemies for judging each other, but some on here have truly shown their colours. Why can't we just support each other, rather than putting someone down and acting like they're dirt, just because they do or don't tale on a name, get married etc? This site used to be such a supportive site. It's really changed over the last 10 years.

MsChookandtheelvesofFahFah · 27/04/2019 11:47

If someone 'resents' their own surname why not change it as soon as you are able? Us 'raving feminists' are just not sure why you are waiting until you can change it on marriage that's all. And then to your future fil's name to boot. Whose background etc might be 100 times worse than your own father! As someone said, it's conditioning.

Jessil91 · 27/04/2019 12:02

Hi all, thanks for the rest of your comments, it been most helpful.

So I spoke to him when he got in from work. I just said that I want the legal and financial security of marriage or civil partnership and I’d be happy to just go the registry office with two witnesses and just get it done. That I’m not bothered about a bit wedding and if we decide to have party/wedding in a few years time when we can afford it hen we can.

He went on to say that we have taken precautions to financially secure ourselves - will, joint mortgage, life insurance etc.

I then went on to say that whilst that’s true, it’s about legally recognising our relationship. In the eyes of the law we’re not official. Without going into too much detail, his family aren’t very nice people and we are estranged from them. If the worst were to happen to him then I know for sure that they’d do everything to contest the will, exclude me from funeral arrangements and just do their utmost to make me look like some women that’s birthed him two children and isn’t the real deal. I said that this is why it’s important that I have the legal status of wife or civil partner because they simply wouldn’t be able to do this. It also just makes things a lot less complicated - yes we could hunt and find a pension scheme that recognizes your partner in the event of your death, yes we could put in the will that I should be next of kin etc etc. But by the time you’ve done all that, you may as well have paid the £46 and just got married/civil partnered. It’s probably more cost effective as well less complex and piecemeal.

I just put it bluntly:
Do you want us to have each other’s pensions? He said yes
Do you want us to get all of the others assets in the event of the others death? He said yes
Do you want me to hAve the final say if your on life support? Ie next of kin? He said yes
Do you want your estranged family who you hate to have more say then me and have them put before me in the eyes of the law if you die? He looked positively mortified at this point before saying absolutely not.

I said to him, well I hate to break it you honey - this means that you do in fact want a civil partnership or marriage.

He went on to say that whilst he sees where I’m coming from, he still thinks the majority of it can be done without marriage/civil partnership. I then argued that whilst that’s true, it’s still so much less complex and again, probably less costly then just covering it all in one contract or civil partnership. He agreed and said he’d prefer a civil partnership.

He then went on to say that there may have been a bit of miscommunication when he said he didn’t believe in getting married. Whilst he doesn’t like marriage as an institution and would have happily carried on without getting married, he was and still is prepared to get married if it means that much to me. He said he just doesn’t really care either way. Just on the basis that as far as he’s concerned we are protected financially, although he does see my point about just getting it done in one contract and it being more straight forward, he’s still not overly bothered. The stuff about his awful family caused some alarm but he said in his heart of hearts, whilst he would hate for me to go through that, I’ve got balls of steel and would knock them out (lol) and he knows I’d be ok in the end.

But still, he recognised that it’s him with the awful family and on that basis, it’s really my call and if a civil partnership or marriage puts my mind at ease then we can do it.

I then said that I was just confused about how on the one hand he’s saying he doesn’t believe in getting married but then on the other hand if he does then he wants a wedding. He just said that he actually just really enjoys weddings, choosing a best man, our daughters as bridesmaids and having a party. I also said that I was confused at how we always talk about the type of wedding we’d have but he didn’t think to mention that he didn’t believe in getting married? He said he didn’t explain himself very well the other night. He just saw marriage as this really big expensive affair that we just can’t afford right now, so when he said he just wanted to carry on as we are, he just meant right now. He said no he doesn’t like marriage and believes its an institution that’s outdated and unnessary but he’s not so against it that he wouldn’t do it if that’s what I really wanted.

In short, he’s happy to just go the registry office with two witnesses and get it done and have party later on if we want to. He likes the idea of a civil partnership over a marriage

OP posts:
hsegfiugseskufh · 27/04/2019 12:06

Ive already said i was going to change it anyway... Hmm

I could have changed it at 16 but i hadnt cut off contact then. A lot has happened since.

If i hated FIL i wouldn't take his name either would i?

Regardless all names come from somewhere.. does it matter whos i have as long as i am happy with it?

Picking a random name that means shite all to anyone might be the ideal but it seems incredibly silly and unneccesary to me.

Feminism shouldn't be "agree with us and live by our rules or fuck off" which is very much the vibe being given off here.

Meandwinealone · 27/04/2019 12:13

Well done op. Sounds like a sensible conversation and in all honesty I think your dp didn’t really have an understanding of what marriage actually is.

justarandomtricycle · 27/04/2019 12:19

Personally I don't take a hard line traditional view on marriage as you could easily see from my PP.

My observation that it's arrogant to tell other people that they don't believe in equality, or that they owe you obedience in their choices, isn't founded in my position on marriage. It's founded in how insufferable the false consciousness fallacy makes people to others.

Swipe left for the next trending thread