*If someone is killed whilst partaking in an activity that is/you consider to be immoral I think it's normal to feel less than you would if someone is killed through no fault of their own.
If a drink driver kills themselves and occupants of another car, you will feel more sympathy for the people in the other car.
If someone was bitten by a dog whilst minding their own business I would feel really badly for them. If someone was bitten by a dog whilst partaking in a dog fight I would think, well.....it is really terrible, but you did probably deserve to have your face bitten off!
That man who got eaten by his lion recently. It is sad, but he shouldn't have had a lion in his back garden. I feel less for him than I would have done if the lion had escaped and eaten someone from the village.
I think that's fairly normal.*
That's just how I felt reading the article.
I wouldn't say anything hurtful to a member of his family, because I've got enough decency not to wish to upset somebody who is grieving. But I'm not going to pretend to feel genuine compassion for a total stranger who died while engaged in an activity I'm opposed to (hunting animals is illegal, but the League of Cruel Sports have evidence of many hunts continuing to do it and the Countryside Alliance have said that this man advocated for bloodsports).