But I DO want to use it. Regularly. Just not as often as they think I should, which is far too frequent in my opinion, compared to other NHS services. Every two years would be fine, with no urgent issues.
Makes sense to me. Any business/service that benefits financially from your patronage wants you to go as often as they can get you to go.
Your local takeaway would far prefer you to go every Friday evening, but they won't decline your custom if you turn up once a year. I know it's not the same thing, but the principle is similar.
Advice used to always be to replace mattresses every 10-15 years. Now, with many years of advancements and improvements in mattress design and technology, it's every 8 years. Whichever place it is in the adverts shows that they write the year you buy it on a label, so if you bought one on New Year's Eve, you'd effectively have an ever-present nag that you 'must' replace it after 7 years, even if you were only ever going to use it occasionally in a guest bedroom.
Maybe, if your GP were personally paid a fee every time you went for a check-up, you might find that they would 'recommended' much shorter intervals than they currently do. I don't know. Logic dictates that, if an annual check is great, then a 6-monthly one must be even better and a quarterly one must be even better still. Having one every day would surely be the very best option for reducing your risks of poor health, but who would ever suggest that as a reasonable use of everybody's time and resources?
I don't know if it's always (or ever) true, but I've read reports of US doctors demanding all manner of 'essential' routine tests and procedures at low-risk births (which, of course, are not 'free' in the way that NHS births are), all of which add to the bill being run up by the patient/their health insurance company, many of which would never be considered in circumstances where the inflated cost could not be passed straight on to a third party.