DS currently having driving lessons. He took his test a couple of weeks ago and on his way back to test centre was asked to pull over. As he did so he hit the kerb (poor DS - was gutted as was doing really well up until that point but this is a major so instant fail
). Instructor is now asking DS to pay towards damage of wheel. He given a figure of "approx £400". He told DS that it has happened before with another pupil and he was very annoyed that she didn't offer to pay and would therefore like DS to pay this time. My reasons for saying he is a CF are:
- Surely that's covered by his insurance? My opinion is that when you undertake to teach people to drive you accept the risks of damage to the car and that your insurance is in place to take care of any such damage.
- He seems to be taking out his annoyance with former pupil on DS. It isn't DS's fault that this has happened before and as it is an expensive repair then driving instructor should think again before having swanky wheels put on a learner car. (Disclaimer: not sure if £400 is expensive for this repair but seems excessive to me).
- DS has autism and instructor is aware of this. I feel that the instructor should have addressed us in this matter rather than pressuring a vulnerable young adult. DS is still at school and clearly is not going to have a spare £400 laying around so obviously the payment will come from us - and I think instructor would know this.
What say the MN Jury? I'm at work at the moment so apologies if I don't respond immediately to any questions you may have
.