Stbx (loooong story, but we are divorcing and stuck in the same house. Well, I’m stuck as I have no money (he’s financially controlling), and he’s refusing to move out) is arsing about again.
We have a very long running disagreement about the differences in how he treats the dc (in a nutshell, the girls are always corrected/put down, whereas ds can do no wrong and is the golden child). There are many, many instances of this over the years, but none particularly relevant as a standout situation.
Today, totally out of the blue, he sends me a link to an article and said “perhaps this will help you understand why I spend so much more time with ds. I know you don’t agree with what I do, but it’s important - see attached”
The link is to an article about knife crime amongst black teenagers from disadvantaged backgrounds who grew up with no male role models (ie absent fathers - but truly, properly absent - totally missing, never present at all, not ‘no longer living in the family home, but still involved’).
We are not black, or any other ethnic minority. Nor disadvantaged. ExH is the epitome of white male privelege.
How the hell am I supposed to respond?
“Oh, ok, ExH, now you’ve explained why you massively favour ds, by appropriating experiences which have absolutely no relevance to ds in any way (he’s only 6, we live in leafy surburbia, he has 2 involved parents, the list goes on, and while I am not naive enough to believe that all will be rosy in his future, I really don’t think rampant knife crime is something we could reasonably expect in our sleepy town, or at his bubble of a private school) then yes, I think you are quite right to continue snubbing your daughters in favour of your son”
So far, I have ignored it. But I expect he will bring it up in person at some point...