I'd just read that David French piece you posted, lion, before returning to this thread. (I agree with him on very little, as I have seem him as an occasional talking head, and read some of what he has written on BLM, 2nd amdt. rights, evangelical Christianity - although he did reject the Oaf , after a brief affaire de coeur.)
Who would not wish for a child in need to be taken to thrive the arms of a loving family? But, evangelicals do it in a specific cause. Therein is my unease.
French on Roe v Wade:
What went wrong? The Supreme Court went wrong .......
........The moral consequences of this intellectual bankruptcy have been profound. Millions of children have been poisoned, stabbed, and dismembered. Our democracy has been corrupted to protect abortion charnel houses even from the most basic commonsense regulations. The precedents and reasoning that created the abortion right have translated into a belief in a “living constitution” that is so deeply embedded into the philosophy of the Left that it now believes that the Court can and should simply decide the correct outcome of any given case and then “find” the right and reasoning in some combination of philosophy, law, precedent, and (sometimes) even selectively chosen foreign legal decisions.'
The death penalty:
www.nationalreview.com/2018/08/death-penalty-defense-helps-preserve-dignity-of-life/
Spreading the 'word':
'Last August[2015] he and his wife, Susannea former youth ministerreleased Reclaim Your School!: 10 Steps to Practically and Legally Evangelize Your School (Pacific Justice Institute). In two months they sold 2,000 copies of the book, without national advertising or media promotions.'
www.charismanews.com/politics/elections/57575-meet-david-french-defender-of-the-faith-and-defeater-of-trump
This is his wife:
www.politico.com/blogs/click/2011/07/meet-bristol-palins-ghostwriter-037383