I’ve been involved in debates and discussions about traveller rights, professionally.
I will say this and I say it time and again:
It is so frustrating that when people are defending travellers, there is a refusal to acknowledge the scale of problems that is caused by travellers. Not all travellers, but travellers nonetheless.
And I will never understand why people who claim to want open communication around this discussion use “it’s not all travellers” as a go to.
Of course it’s not all travellers, just like not all groups of teenagers from problematic socio-economic backgrounds are looking for trouble.
Until there is an acknowledgement that some learned behaviours and attitudes are problem-causing, nothing will change.
The way of life that you claim is being eroded is oftentimes not only inconvenient but downright dangerous for other people.
You can deny the fly-tipping, the violence, the intimidation, the damage of property. But it’s there and it’s a problem.
There was a funeral for a traveller in my neck of the woods this weekend and some travellers were in the media bemoaning the fact that shops and pubs wouldn’t open in the town that weekend.
But no acknowledgment of the fact that last year at another funeral, the town was utterly trashed. People’s cars were broken into and destroyed. Graves were destroyed because they were drinking and fighting at the graveyard. Shops were robbed. People were beaten and furniture smashed in the pubs.
Obviously there’s a reason that this behavior is rampant and some of it at least seems to belong firmly to that particular ethnicity.
It’s a shame because I do feel like it’s a viscous circle.