Why does anyone need to wear flip flops to drive anyway?
I literally live in flip flops - if I changed into and then out of driving shoes to undertake the short journeys that I do every day it would literally double my journey time. I do mean "literally", not "figuratively"
Disclaimer: I don't wear the thin foam ones, I wear toe post birkenstocks, Gumbies or similar thicker soled flip flops. I'm interested in understanding more about how the flip-flop can get wedged under the brake pedal - is it just the thin ones that are risky?
I'm willing to reconsider my driving footwear choices, but not on the basis of a few people going "OMG that happened to me!" without understanding the detail more. My driving choices generally are a bit different from most MNers - I don't ever drink whilst driving (I still prefer my hands in the 10-to-two position!), I insist that the DC wear seat belts (not mandatory here) and that they sit down whilse I'm driving (also not a mandatory requirement), I keep to the speed limit (relatively easy here, given how bad the roads are), but DD isn't in a full booster seat like she would need to be in the UK. For context, although accidents are common, they are mostly at junctions where vehicles are going at low speed. Last year, fewer than 20 people died in RTAs, and whilst that is obviously 20 too many, 19 of these were motorcyle riders, of which 18 weren't wearing a helmet. The one car driver who died on the roads was significantly over the (generous) drink drive limit when he crashed.
Like Kursk and BlueBiros, I like to weigh up implications and consequences of my choices and change my habits based on evidence relevant to circumstances. (I don't mean that to sound sanctimonious, but the tone on this thread against anyone who hasn't said that they will burn their flip-flops forthwith has rather brought that out in me...
)