We've no official arrangements or anything, just been loosely planning to get married 'perhaps next year'.
Give the baby your surname!
I've heard of more than one wedding that was pushed to the eternal back burner after DC came along and safely had the dad's name.
Suddenly accordign to dad, no need to rush into marriage at all...
You're 30 weeks pregnant. Of course you don't want to organise and do a quickie wedding. And why the hell should you?
I LOVE how none of this was an issue at all, total ASSUMPTION that the child would be registered with his name even though no wedding is even planned yet. Him just complacently assumign that his name would take absolute precedence.
Now you mention that actually you will be giving the baby your name at birth, whatever that might be, and even on here there's all sorts of solutions being offered to the huge, unpleasant problem of your baby shock horror having your name instead - even for a year or so.
There doesn't need to be a quickie wedding or some complex solution.
The easiest, fairest and best way of doing this is what OP plans to do. Give her baby her name. The baby's actual BIRTH NAME, because they are not married.
Then if or when they do marry, both names will be changed with no fuss at all.
Watch while the sky falls in as we all comtemplate the unthinkable - a solution in which a man and his wants are not given first priority!!!