Well, obviously the deaths are going to be higher related to the drug which is the most readily available.
I’m not minimising the effects of alcohol btw. As I said up thread, I lost a parent (my mother) to alcoholism when she was quite young, so I’m all too aware of what a dreadful drug it is.
But I don’t think saying that we should be mainly focussed on just alcohol is terribly helpful.
I’ve just watched a segment about this on This Morning and their experts were reiterating what I’ve been saying on here; the problem is that because they aren’t legal, they aren’t regulated and there could be literally anything in the pills / powders people buy. This is simply not the case when you buy a bottle of wine from Tesco, so it is less of a Russian roulette situation. It’s very rare to die the first time you try one little glass of wine. One little pill? Not common to die either, but it still happens too much. There are more unknowns around drugs because they are used less and are illegal. That makes them riskier on an individual level. At a societal level, alcohol will have more negative effects because most people, of all ages, do it at some point.
There was an expert on the program I just mentioned who goes round festivals testing drugs as a service to drug users. I think this is a fab idea. The festival goer hands over a teeny sample, which this charity then test in a little mobile lab and they then tell the festival goer what’s in it. Brilliant!
It still could have been smuggled in in in someone’s asshole, but still.
They were also saying that drug use is a lot more common than you might think. Teenagers now have much more easy access to it through social media. It’s something which does need to be tackled; not in an overly simplistic “don’t do drugs way” either. It would be completely foolish to not do this and just “focus on alcohol”.