The size of your TV in the UK is supposed to be inverse proportion to your class. I saw this programme which is nicely done and the family who are not well off halved their income because the mother has this
"Fibromyalgia. Fibromyalgia (FM) is a medical condition characterised by chronic widespread pain and a heightened pain response to pressure. Other symptoms include tiredness to a degree that normal activities are affected, sleep problems and troubles with memory".
Her partner (not sure if they are married) bought his house they live in when they were young - they got together as teenagers and he is very proud they own their own house. He works 6 days a week.
They didn't say he was poor. They just said the family was in the bottom 10%. If everyone is much better off than we all used to be say 150 eyars ago then bottom 10% is not necessarily poverty at all as absolute not relative poverty is the correct measure.
My sky costs about £70 a month and I pay separately for my broadband and land line and netflix.
What was interesting about the latest episode of the programme was that instead of the rich person this time being working class lad made good like most of the other episode these were 2 barrister and you could see the class difference, trumpet lessons, grand piano, parents not letting the children have games consoles, loads of debates over dinner tables, children reading, parents supervising homework - not that working class badly off families don't visit the public library of course and anyone can go along to their local church and join the choir even if they cannot afford to hire a trumpet or learn an instrument. That kind of cultural capital does not have to be expensive.