True, I don’t quite see why ratepayers should foot the bill for suchlessons, any more than the Government in Madrid should be expected to teach me Spanish. Clearly, however, any investment in integration must be wiser than discouraging Ghanaians from learning English by printing all documents in Twi.
But let me end with the heart-rending case, reported last weekend, of the Sri Lankan mother whose inability to speak English meant she was unable to understand midwives’ advice on how to feed her baby, who was born in an NHS hospital a year after she arrived in London as a refugee. As a result, Sinthiya Rajatheepan’s son, now eight, was left brain-damaged.
Now fast forward to a week ago today, when the High Court ruled that he should receive compensation from the NHS, expected to run into millions of pounds.
This was because the midwives failed to employ an interpreter to explain the importance of proper feeding techniques to Sinthiya, who was 21 when her boy was born.
God knows, my heart goes out to this family, and I fully accept our humane public duty to help with the boy’s upbringing. But millions of pounds’ compensation? By what perversion of sanity can the NHS be held to blame for this poor woman’s failure to understand English, in England?
The above is what Tom Utley of the Mail had to say