@sidewayswithatescotrolley
Is that used to be men or now are men?
They're talking about FtT (born female, now living as a man) or "genderqueer" people, who don't like to be considered as women or any "gender".
But if they have actually transitioned, either way, why would they need the services?
Because 'transitioning' in the modern context often doesn't involve surgery. So all reproductive organs are intact and can be used. Therefore a 'man' with a womb can get pregnant if another man impregnates him.
It used to be the case that in most cases of 'transexuals' (a word that is now not generally thought to be PC), gender dysphoria meant that that person would be horrified at the thought of using their natal sex organs as it would remind them that they are not the gender they believe themselves to be. So surgery, or certainly not having PiV sex if you were a trans man.
That's now not really the case - as gender is fluid, so too is the definition of trans, and how and where and why you have sex and with whom is also none of anyone else's business (as it should be) until you get pregnant via a penis in your man vagina, and then reproductive services must remember that you are a pregnant man with a male 'womb' ...
It's quite hard to get your head around.
I actually don't care if people still retain their natal sex organs - I think genital surgery etc sounds horrific and is in now way something that should be forced upon someone just to conform.
But I do object to all the confusing double-speak around male vaginas, female penises and chestfeeding/chest cancer etc etc.
Being a woman (or a man) is primarily about biology, whether you like it or not. It does none of us any favours to try to rewrite this.