What some posters don’t understand is that when people proclaiming to be teachers state that they hate children who are not toilet trained, children who cannot dress themselves and so on and then quickly follow it up with ‘Oh, but we don’t mean SEN - we don’t mean your child’ it is of scant comfort.
The overall message - because let’s cut out the other stuff and get to what those posters are really saying, which is something like, “I judge lazy, stupid parents who cannot be bothered to toilet train their child.” Adding a cheery “but we don’t mean you, parents of disabled children! No indeed” doesn’t make that any less hard to read.
It is probably a bad example but it reminds me of when AIDS was still a “taboo” disease and distinctions were drawn between say, people who had obtained the disease through a blood transfusion and people, especially homosexual people, who had caught it through having unprotected sex. Oh But I Didn’t Mean You makes no difference, they both still had AIDS, they both still had to deal with stupid ignorance and prejudice, early death, pain, suffering.
Do you see where I’m going?
If a child is not potty trained by the time she gets to reception - accidents aside - something is wrong, whether that’s a disability or an infection or lazy parenting or trauma.
Why don’t some of you just say “I don’t want to teach children from certain homes”
It would be honest, anyway.