Enuffsenuffsenuff "soooo... you can't respond to that analogy then? Because this attempt to fling mud instead isn't working as a distraction."
No, that was a cross-post that wasn't specifically directed at you. It would be nice if you assumed good faith on my part though, rather than assuming that because I am disagreeing with you I must be some disingenuous villain.
If it helps the debate along (it shouldn't, but maybe it will), I have never had dreadlocks, braids, cornrows or any other hairstyle that may be considered cultural appropriation, or knowingly engaged in any other cultural appropriation. So I'm not arguing from the point of view of "wanting to continue doing whatever I like". I'm arguing from the point of view of being someone of a long-standing left-liberal persuasion who is uncomfortable with where left of centre politics seems to be going at the current time.
I didn't engage with your analogy because, to be honest, I didn't find it that apt. From my perspective, the issue is one of discrimination rather than credit assignment. We know that certain hairstyles associated with black people tend to lead to discrimination and particularly so when worn by black people. I don't doubt or deny that.
But that is why rather than engage with your analogy, I tried to introduce the example of employment discrimination, which I considered to be more apt in this case. Perhaps you would be willing to engage with that example?