Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think there's a valid discussion to be had about the ethics of surrogacy?

334 replies

LRDtheFeministDragon · 15/02/2018 13:15

Just what the title says.

I know some women become gestational surrogates out of altruism, and that in some places (not the UK) women can be paid quite a bit to be surrogates. But I still think the ethics of it is worth discussing.

I'm curious how other people see this. I worry that it's so easy for women to be exploited. And it does seem to me that there's a gendered issue here. I'm not sure men 'get' how difficult and potentially dangerous pregnancy is.

OP posts:
NinjagoNinja · 18/02/2018 11:34

She is still used as a vessel, even if told she is an angel. The only thing she gets is the halo of altruism, which is a very low price for the effort and can only be attractive in a society where women are valued for how much they sacrifice, not what they achieve

Spot on

Jassmells · 18/02/2018 12:56

@CapnHaddock quite an unusual article to appear in the guardian perhaps the tide is turning...

Jassmells · 18/02/2018 12:56

Even if it was a year ago (!)

ChattyLion · 19/02/2018 20:50

stitchglitched thank you for the link.
Do you know if researchers have also looked at how the children of surrogates (ie the children being brought up by their mother who is also a surrogate ) get on? What do they feel about their mother being pregnant and the baby then leaving their family? Does it feel different to them if the baby is someone else’s embryo or if the baby is genetically a half sibling of theirs, via their mums egg? And does how those children feel, differ from how children of egg (or sperm) donors feel about their parent/s being donors and giving eggs and sperm to other people?

NeedsAsockamnesty · 20/02/2018 00:14

is a surrogate and has strongly advocated for pre birth orders, she has argued that this would offer surrogates significantly more legal protection if they had access to them. current framework for parental orders means surros have no protection if IPs were to hypothetically change their mind

They have exactly the same protection as any other pregnant women should the other parent have no interest and the same if neither parent does.

mtpaektu · 20/02/2018 08:31

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

NeedsAsockamnesty · 20/02/2018 10:12

I’m also fascinated by the whole automatic referral to social services at booking appointment if your a surrogate.

I can’t find a nhs policy that states it’s essential or one that goes as far as saying it’s a legal requirement.

All the policies related to making sure the surrogate is cared for over the IP’s and how that will happen with a passing referance to a meeting with everybody that can include a safeguarding midwife if needed but is not a requirement.

In my experance with children’s social care the only surrogates we came into immediate or fast contact with was the vulnerable ones or the more bizarre situation ones until such time as the parental order was applied for.

And it beggars belief that anyone involved in any way with an ounce of understanding of how the law relating to children works would even attempt to convince themselves and others that a prebirth order protects anybody other than the IP’s.

And using the argument that a pregnant woman’s husband has to be recorded as the child’s biological parent thus preventing the biological father from exercising any responsibility is ridiculous in the extreme as that is only the case where the woman’s husband consents to it occurring, one would think that should the husband not wish this to occur then unless all involved are a little hard of thinking then all he has to do is not consent which paves the way for the actual biological father to be named and if that occurs promptly then there is no up to 6 month gap where there is nobody with PR caring for the baby on a daily basis.

Beetlejizz · 20/02/2018 10:58

And it beggars belief that anyone involved in any way with an ounce of understanding of how the law relating to children works would even attempt to convince themselves and others that a prebirth order protects anybody other than the IP’s.

Yeah.

If prebirth orders genuinely are favoured by the majority of surrogates, what that tells us is that there's a need for more education about the law amongst this group, and the limits of what a prebirth order could actually accomplish. And actually that's potentially valuable information.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread