To be honest, your post is uncomfortable to read, you are assuming that if someone who lived in these flats were moved on a temporary basis to a comfortable environment, they would somehow not understand that this would be temporary, and part of a recovery process. These are not stupid people, why are you assuming that this is the case? They need support and a lot of leeway and understanding, not assumptions that add to their trauma and vulnerability.
You can post long waffly posts if you like it don't put your fiction in my mouth. Really, what nonsense.
You said the survivors should be given 5* temporary accommodation.
I said that actually I thought it was cruel to do that when what was really most important now was stability and justice.
And from that exchange you invent all of that?!
Similarly, you objected to my use of "the poor" to mean "the poor" upthread and launched off into some strange rant about deserving and undeserving and what have you, which nobody had said, meant or alluded to.
The poor are poor, most of them are working poor and the market has been allowed to distort to keep them that way, but if we get too mealy mouthed and euphemistic about it, nobody will recognise that we do - shamefully - have millions of poor.
I wouldn't mind you hair splitting and inventing things to be upset about so much if it weren't for your own use of "these people".
Perhaps you could do me a favour and ignore my posts. I'll gladly ignore yours. You don't seem to understand what anyone else is saying and your own contributions are unreadable.