Peanut,
Sadly the case. But fitness studios/gyms (and the effing media in general, frankly) could so easily include a wider range of size images in their promotional blurb.
At least then people are able to take inspiration and hope from whoever is the appropriate role model for their natural shape and build.
If a vast majority are told brainwashed to believe they should only idolise the incredibly honed, abs-to-die-for, thigh gap, long & lean, peach-bottomed, supposed 'ideal', that's up to them.
But a short, very stocky, body type (or the naturally very thin, flat-chested) is never going to achieve that, even if every hour of the day is spent in the gym. At least not without radical cosmetic surgery.
Why should she be pressured into feeling bad about herself. Or succumb to peer pressure (sometimes bullying), potentially endangering herself, and certainly becoming miserable, in the struggle for their approval?
Healthier (and fairer) if she sees her shape regularly deemed acceptable and normal for her, just as much as the usual visions of so-called perfection.
Sidenote: Ditto those with certain health conditions or disabilities which make simply "moving more" impossible. Sod all representation of our images on the fitness radar either (only ever when very specifically relating to human interest stories/ the Paralympics etc.).
Sorry for ranting everyone, and on your thread, OP: I need to calm down now!
Don't even dare read the controversial (really?) Twitter mud-slinging, for fear I'll combust altogether.