This is one reason why I used to cycle to work. I mean I know it's not possible for everyone if it's too far, but it's great if it's a doable distance. For me, it was about 3.5 miles and took me maybe 27 minutes there and 23 minutes back (it was half flat and half uphill there, and half flat and half downhill back, so coming back took less time.)
It was brilliant, and although I was knackered for the first couple of weeks, it wasn't long before it became a breeze. I became fit too, and my usually aloof manager became very chummy, as she was a cycling fanatic.
It was a 10-15 minute drive, (depending on traffic,) but took 45 minutes by bus, because of all the stops. Plus I also had a 10 minute walk to the bus stop and had to be there a few minutes before it came, and it was a 10 minute walk to my works at the other end.
So two and a quarter hours of my day was spent getting to work and back, and it cost about a tenner a week too. (This was about 10 years back.) But cycling only took just over three quarters of an hour of my day. And it saved me £520 a year, and kept me fit.
So I would encourage anyone to cycle if they can, and if it's not too far, and if the route is safe; two thirds of my journey was on a cycle path through town, and only one third on the road. So it was mostly quite ok.