In having a 13 year old watch ds?
Loopyloppy · 30/06/2017 12:34
Ds is 3.5. A family friend who we know fairly well has just started to babysit. She's only 13 but has done two cpr (first aid courses) and a six month 'babysitting' course, whatever that is. She's a sensible girl.
I've hired her to start looking after ds a few hours a week. I thought for the first couple of months I'd stick around. Just so I can work in the garden more. (Ds is a fucking nightmare 'helping' with the weeding- i.e. pulling out seedlings and it would be a huge help to have someone do lego and play with him.)
I was telling a couple of friends last night and they were all pearl clutchy and saying how unsafe it would be and they wouldn't dream of it.
I'm not planning on just buggering off and leaving her with him, I'll be around outside. This is fine right?!
And what age do you think someone can be left with a (bouncy) 3.5 year old? Depends on both of them right? Would it be awful to leave her with him for a couple of hours in a couple of months when I'm sure she's competent?
TheLegendOfBeans · 30/06/2017 12:39
For me that's a child looking after another child. God forbid something bad happened I'd worry about a 13yo having the quick thinking and rationality to act without panic; I wouldn't want to put that responsibility on a young teen.
For me I'd rather have someone 18+ as that to me is an adult.
Mylittlesunshines · 30/06/2017 12:43
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
blueskyinmarch · 30/06/2017 12:44
So the 13yo is really just around as an extra pair of hands to amuse your DS? That sounds like an excellent compromise. The girl can hone her care skills and you can get on with other chores. When she is a little older you can then build up to leaving them both together for a while. Before you know it she will be 15/16 and you will be enjoying a new lease of life with a trusted sitter.
Loopyloppy · 30/06/2017 12:45
Right. I also feel that her life experience and reactions would be questionable in an emergency situation. I've sort of been bullied in to this by mil who initially was saying I should hire her every day in the summer so I could work but I shot that one down pretty quickly.
Of course having a three year old, large vegetable gardens and chickens (we're pretty much self sufficient in the summer at least) is me taking it easy.
GreenHillsOfHome · 30/06/2017 12:47
Of course it's fine.
I leave ds1 'in charge' of ds3 when I run upstairs for a wee or go and hang the washing out. Ds1 is 9 and ds3 is 6 weeks . Ds3 is on his play mat or in his bouncer and not about to toddle off anywhere and ds1 can be trusted to not try to pick him up or do anything other than talk or sing to him, which he loves doing.
I can well imagine leaving him for short periods to occupy a 3 year old when he's 12 and I'm cooking dinner or the like...as I imagine is the norm in most families with similar age gaps.
notanevilstepmother · 30/06/2017 12:50
I think it's fine within limits. I'd leave a sensible 13 year old for a short time with a child and if I knew there was someone around (neighbours etc) but not for a full day.
However there are many kids that age who do look after their siblings for whole days at that age, not ideal, but not disastrous either or we would be hearing about it.
I used to babysit at that age, but I always knew my parents were just around the corner if there was an emergency. There never was, but it was reassuring.
AndNoneForGretchenWieners · 30/06/2017 12:50
I used to babysit the neighbours kids at 13 while their parents weren't there. My mum was nearby if anything happened but it was fine - you will be in yelling distance so can't see anything wrong with this.
DSS would look after DS too at a similar age, while DS was a baby. I appreciate with a sibling it's different though.
Questioningeverything · 30/06/2017 12:56
Well I ask my ds (4) to watch ds2 (10months and cruising) while I put my washing out/ have a quick shower (3min job) or change sheets, make dinner etc.
Yeah ds1 is young and certainly not babysitting but stuff has to get done. I'd much sooner hire the 13yr old but there's no one I know available
Loopyloppy · 30/06/2017 12:57
When we do get to possibly leaving for a little while mil is next door and her parents are close by too.
As an aside, sil is leaving her 2 year old and 2 month old with a ten year old girl (who she doesn't know at all) for periods up to two hours. That I'm a bit about.
AndTakeYourHorseWithYou · 30/06/2017 13:14
As an aside, sil is leaving her 2 year old and 2 month old with a ten year old girl (who she doesn't know at all) for periods up to two hours
I don't think I've ever said this in all my years on MN, but I'd be calling social services about that. Dangerous for all the children involved.
Jellycatspyjamas · 30/06/2017 13:35
It's worth knowing that while legally you can leave the 13 year old to look after your little one, legally you are responsible for both of them because legally they are both children. At 16 a young person can take legal responsibility for the child they are looking after but up until then, if anything untoward did happen you'd be accountable for any harm to both children.
fannyanddick · 30/06/2017 13:41
I used to babysit a 4, 7, 11 and 12 (special needs) yo when I was 13/14 until 18. For a couple of hours 4-6 pm. For a bit I had six, a 5yo and 7yo. We all live to tell the tail! I think a capable, sensible and switched on 13 is fine to look after a 3year old in the house for short periods. Even if you are out.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.