AngharadGoldenhand - that is again becoming the norm though marriage is less common! I know several couples who rent in flat shares despite earning well above the national average. One difference today is effective contraception keeping the birth rate down for people in such situations.
I have never known anyone who fought in the 2nd world war - the problems my generation have pale into insignificance compared to that. The attitude I complained about comes from those older generations in their fifties, sixties and early seventies who tell stressed mothers that they should not have had children if they were not able to stay at home and look after them and that we need to get on that property ladder because the price of their home has doubled in the past few years (said with a ).
When we explain why that is not possible we are always told how hard they had it in their day - "when we first bought this house...." etc, we work hard in relatively better paid jobs and could not afford a two bedroom flat let alone a family home. Then you get the infuriating "can't or won't" comments I had earlier on this thread...
When measuring poverty, income is taken into account but expenditure on housing is not - most older people have secure tenancies of some sort or own their own homes. They do not usually appreciate how high the cost of living is for young families, perhaps because the different age groups just don't spend enough time together.
I don't have any problem with older people myself but I do think there is a growing sense of resentment and intergenerational conflict. This will probably get worse, as the people in positions of power are themselves older and see nothing wrong with announcing that younger generations will have to work longer to pay baby-boomers' pensions, while having little hope of pensions themselves.