I apologise Suzicream, not only do you not read the Guardian you don't even read the posts you respond to.
To put it more simply for your benefit, my point was that charities often spend the money more efficiently the governments, and certainly in ways the government would not.
Yes, aid is often a bad thing, because the British government tries to acheive too much. The idea is to both help the recipient, as well as buying votes at home. Hence the senseless building of dams in shit countries, radars that don't work, and of course the laughable insanity of buying British figher jets.
That being said a major cause of the problems with shit countries is the way they "run" themselves. It would be mad to give money to their so-called governments without trying to stop them using it all to buy new cars, and villas in France.
I don't accept the 650,000 number of dead in Iraq, indeed I don't believe any number that is cited simply because every single source of numbers I've seen has proven themselves dishonestly stupid.
Comic relief is not in a position to alter British strategy in Iraq. Trust me on this. They can't redraw the borders of African countries more rationally, and they lack the capbility of killing the 2-300 people you need to be rid of in Zimbabwe.
So should they just give up ?