Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to be put off by the amount of money spent to make programs for comedy relief?

103 replies

purplemonkeydishwasher · 16/03/2007 10:02

Surely they could just put that money to good use here and abroad.

AND I'm absolutely DISGUSTED by the gluttony and drunkeness in the Fame Academy house. they are doing this for STARVING people. Get a grip on reality.

OP posts:
Roskvawantingsomesunshine · 16/03/2007 10:14

I agree. I have heard it said that the larger the charity, the lesser the percentage of its funds go to good causes. Comic relief has lost the plot completely.

Ali5 · 16/03/2007 10:19

Have always been suspicious, I think it rates as one of the worst for the amount it takes for 'administration'. Think the celebs only get involved because it's good for their image. Children in Need is the only one I've heard of where all the money donated goes direct to the good cause.

gobshite · 16/03/2007 10:36

Some smaller charities have practically no overhead - friends of mine run this one, for example

Soweto Connection

and they have no overheads except bank charges transferring money to the groups they support - about 99p in every pound donated goes to work on the ground in townships in Africa. But without the bigger charities spending money, raising awareness, nobody would understand the issues enough to support Soweto COnnection. In a way, they are free riding on the bigger charities.

Still, I prefer to give to them, cause I know the money is going straight to work

Ali5 · 16/03/2007 11:17

The raising awareness is a good point. I suppose the thing about comic relief is that it's really high profile - I bet they could still bring awareness without flying all those celebs out to various places to make a 5 minute 'isn't this awful' clip.

expatinscotland · 16/03/2007 11:18

No. I'm suspicious of celebs of the 'do as I say and not as I do ilk.'

Even more so than the government because at least many of those in government know how to read as well.

expatinscotland · 16/03/2007 11:18

Can't say the same for most 'celebrities'.

AitchYouBerk · 16/03/2007 11:19

i understood that the BBC (which after all gets hy-oooooge ratings off this) foots the bill for the production costs. don't know about the clips, although part of me wonders if they'd ask them to pay for their own ticket, my understanding is that to be in the Comic Relief Gang has benefits for the career taht would easily outweight the cost of a ticket to the Sudan.

DimpledThighs · 16/03/2007 11:20

on the apprentice last night I felt sick when that woman donated 150k without even thinking - it was really generous but I kept thinking maybe a lot of problems aer to do with the fact that some people have 150k lying around whilst others strave.

there is a sinister irony about comic relief.

Eve · 16/03/2007 11:20

... I did see an article last weekend , American Express spent £50 million in marketing the red card to raise £9million.

expatinscotland · 16/03/2007 11:20

In other words, you and I have just contributed to Comic Relief in the form of the TV license, which keeps going up and up!

KathyMCMLXXII · 16/03/2007 11:21

I hate Comic Relief with a passion. I hate the enforced jollity and 'if you don't join in you are an evil person because it's in a good cause' atmosphere that surrounds it, and I hate the way celebrities are blatantly using other people's suffering to further their own careers.
It brings out my most cynical side.

Hulababy · 16/03/2007 11:22

I think it is more about the raising awareness, and what better way to do it with loads of celebs, various types and ages - so covers wide part of the population.

And those clips - I think they are needed; people need that visual image before them. Makes it harder to forget when you can see such hardship and such need. And I think it being celebs going there does help - again it comes down to the awareness.

Ali5 - Terry Wogan is pad a fee for his work with CIN.

AitchYouBerk · 16/03/2007 11:22

i saw that too, eve!

Ali5 · 16/03/2007 11:51

Is Terry paid!? Wow. Didn't know that. Thought he was a good egg and would do it for free!
Thing about the clips is though, it's not just the celeb is it? It's the crew too - someone has to pay and wouldn't that money be better spent. And why do they have to do new ones each year?

Rhubarb · 16/03/2007 11:53

There was a hoohar about administration fees but Comic Relief denied paying out for admin and this year they have banged on about how the money raised goes straight to where it is needed, no admin costs, no staff fees, nothing.

Hulababy · 16/03/2007 11:54

Ali5 - Here

taylormama · 16/03/2007 11:57

i am a fundraiser so you do need to spend some money to make money but all events etc that a charity does should be looked at carefully to ensure a good return. Comic Relief has supported one of the charities i used to work for so i am quite pro what they do ... You can request a copy of their accounts so you can see what percentage goes on admin etc ...

Rhubarb · 16/03/2007 12:00

I'm a fundraiser too and I'd rather support Comic Relief than most other charities because they don't pay out as much as ours does on costs etc.

Hulababy · 16/03/2007 12:00

According to Martin Gill, Comic Releif's head of new media "... Comic Relief doesn't take money from donations to help with our running and admin costs."

zippitippitoes · 16/03/2007 12:07

it is highly ranked for cost effectiveness isn't it

programmes would be made anyway they are just all being hijacked to comic nrelief branding

agree that there is too much money slsohing casually aroind though

Roskvawantingsomesunshine · 16/03/2007 13:22

Well, personally I hear the words 'comic relief' and reach for the remote: I can't stand self righteous celebs pretending they're there for any cause other than their own careers. I support a local charity.

gobshite · 16/03/2007 13:32

Their accounts are here. The income part starts on page 16 of the .pdf, and shows that apart from money they got from the COmmonwealth Education Fund and VOdafone, which seems to have landed fairly freely to them, their running costs look close to 50%

the costs of raising money was about 6.8 million, but including the grants, they disbursed almost ten times that.

So with the grants, they look efficient enough; without them, not amazingly so

purplemonkeydishwasher · 16/03/2007 17:23

the point that i'm making though (and i probably haven't explained myself very well!) is that regardless of HOW they pay for admin, admin is paid for. why not just give the money?
AND I OBJECT to celebrities donating their precious TIME to get me to give my hard earned cash and if i don't i'm the anitchrist.
Fuck off! How much have YOU donated you sponging Z list arse licking wank fest butt monkey?!!!
I donate a few pouns cause that's all i can afford. these people who are flying around first class, buying all the best designer clothes bkah blah blah yadda yadda yadda etc etc if they lived like the REST of us for just ONE MONTH and donated the rest they could really make a ddifference!

OP posts:
DimpledThighs · 16/03/2007 17:26

purplemonkey - you are funny when you are angry!

hatwoman · 16/03/2007 17:33

none of us have any idea how much the celebs donate.