Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To use the disabled loo when I'm with my son?

999 replies

RestingBitch · 19/05/2017 17:06

My sons 9 months and obviously still in his pushchair. The majority of the time it's just me and him when I go into town/visit places. When I need the loo I get an attack of conscious, I normally use the disabled loo so I can bring him in with me.
Can't use a regular loo as I can't get him in the cubicle in his chair. Don't want to take him out of his pushchair and plonk him on the floor as the floors are manky and he will eat whatever is on the floor. He'll also probably try and crawl under the gap and interrupt someone else. Don't really like the idea of leaving him in his pushchair whilst I nip in the cubicle, so providing there isn't someone waiting for the disabled loos, AIBU to use them? I'm usually in and out and so far I've never encountered anyone waiting for one, or the impatient rattle of the door. If I am being unreasonable, short of pissing myself what's the options?

Not a troll, and don't work for any newspapers :).

OP posts:
kali110 · 21/05/2017 14:16

Blazingpups
I may not be understanding your comment, how would you know if the person was disabled though?
Are you saying if a person came along behind you you'd let them go first?

JustAnotherSilentOldNumber · 21/05/2017 14:16

Second class people
With second class needs
They come second place
To personal greeds

They fought tooth and nail
For accessable loos
but that is now taken
for every day use

Second class people
guests at the feast
Why put them first
when they matter the least?

JustAnotherSilentOldNumber · 21/05/2017 14:19

Second class people
scroungers and pests
cuckoos invading
our financial nests

PigletWasPoohsFriend · 21/05/2017 14:19

Clearly there's a issue around accessibility for parents with prams and also suitable changing facilities

So campaign for changes like those with disabilities had and have to!

JustAnotherSilentOldNumber · 21/05/2017 14:20

Second class people
worms in the clay
what does it matter
what's taken away?

Blazingpups · 21/05/2017 14:20

Yes kali I would assume they were either disabled or needed to use that toilet for another reason, obviously I'm not going to start questioning a stranger so I would just let them go first.

I know my reasons for using it, I don't feel the need to judge other people on using it.

JustAnotherSilentOldNumber · 21/05/2017 14:23

Second class people
No one disputed
Whose to complain
When you take from the muted?

kali110 · 21/05/2017 14:25

Blazingpups
Ok i can understand your point now! I take my comment back as i get what you're saying now, though unfortunately people could still be using the loo and not have anything wrong with them.

Sirzy · 21/05/2017 14:26

So campaign for changes like those with disabilities had and have to!

Which they won't do because they are lucky and in a couple of months or years they don't need it any more. (And for most areas disabled people have already done the hard work for them anyway!)

Unlike disabled people who often will face the problems every day for the rest of their lives

PollyPerky · 21/05/2017 14:32

Don't have time to read 28 pages but my thoughts are..........

Waitrose has a loo that has disabled access and on the door are signs for babies, men and women ANd they have a new sign which was funded by bowel charities saying 'Not all disabilities are visible.'

It seems reasonable to me that a loo with a large doorway also doubles up as a baby change / children's loo , or a loo for mums with children in buggies, AND people with a disability.

This is not a black and white issue. There are plenty of people with IBS, bladder problems and similar who are not in theory 'disabled' or haven't gone down the route of getting formal evidence of their conditions, YET they may need a loo urgently. (I fall into this bracket at times.)

IMO they have every right to use a disabled loo, just as someone does with mobility issues, or a mum who doesn't wish to put her baby at risk by leaving them unattended in a buggy while she uses the loo.

Blazingpups · 21/05/2017 14:34

I have campaigned actually sirzy didn't get very far although our new toilets in my local shopping centre now have 1 cubicle big enough to get a double pushchair in separately from the disabled toilet.

Maybe make less assumptions about "them" and what "they" do.

PollyPerky · 21/05/2017 14:35

And if your in the toilet how do you know your not stopping someone going in who actually needs it? Are you going to stop mid wee to let someone in? Are you heck!

But what about the wait if a disabled person is using it already? Disabled people cannot always expect a vacant loo.

Is your answer to put a baby at risk of being abducted, by leaving them unattended, or the parent wetting or pooing herself?? You need to be practical.

Sirzy · 21/05/2017 14:38

as has been repeated over and over of course there is a risk that someone disabled is using it. It's a constant worry for a lot of people. That however doesn't justify people who aren't disabled using it

JustAnotherSilentOldNumber · 21/05/2017 14:41

Second class people
worthless and cursed
let's downplay the struggle
and put ourselves first.

Second class people
Live second class days
we use their sevice
while they get in the way

JustAnotherSilentOldNumber · 21/05/2017 14:44

I'll warn everyone now There's 4 more pages of this poem and the rhyming doens't get any better.

BeyondStrongAndStable · 21/05/2017 14:45

I wonder if this is how mn wanted this to go?

Can't criticise certain famous parents because mn is for making parents lives easier. So long as they aren't disabled parents or parents of children with disabilities.

This thread isn't AB people who would use the disabled toilet understand, it is giving them other people saying they are in the right to justify their decision. Like how the out vote justifying people making racist attacks.

So yes, I am upset, and yes, I am shocked that they have changed their position on this.

BeyondStrongAndStable · 21/05/2017 14:47
  • helping AB people understand
JustAnotherSilentOldNumber · 21/05/2017 14:47

I wonder if this is how mn wanted this to go?

Every page view bring in money.

Mumsnet have been like this for a very long time.

Sirzy · 21/05/2017 14:49

Exactly beyond

You have to wonder what the point of them doing their campaigns about awareness and stuff and then letting blatant disablism go.

JustAnotherSilentOldNumber · 21/05/2017 14:50

Money

Spikeyball · 21/05/2017 15:00

My local supermarket accessible toilet now has the 'not all disabilities are visible' sign and the male and female signs. This means that since it is the nearest toilet to the cafe, people use that one instead of walking to the male and female toilets. I wish they would take the male and female signs down.

Sirzy · 21/05/2017 15:09

In our local wetherspoons the disabled toilet (radar locked) is downstairs, the other toilets are upstairs.

If you are sat close by it is amazing how many people come and try the door and when it is locked happily go off upstairs (not even using the lift!) for the toilets rather than getting the key!

If it has been left open there are always plenty of people using it though...

PigletWasPoohsFriend · 21/05/2017 15:14

or the parent wetting or pooing herself??

We at least one poster didn't mind a person with disability potentially wetting or pooing themselves whilst they breastfeed in the toilet did they.

Cheepandorm · 21/05/2017 16:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

PigletWasPoohsFriend · 21/05/2017 16:55

Why waste your Sunday afternoon posting it?

Not for you to say what people should or shouldn't post!

Swipe left for the next trending thread