i dont believe people should have the right to kill innocent babies whether there in there womb or not as there is no moral diffrence as far as i can tell between a baby outside of the womb that is premature than a baby at the same age who is in the womb.
Other than its not a baby! But who needs biology.
I'm pro life and pro choice. The difference between you and I is that I dont think my personal beliefs should be imposed on other women.
You are anti-choice. To be anti-choice you are saying that you are some kind of moral authority and have the right to dictate others. Somebody being pro choice would never tell you to abort so why are you so awesome that you can tell another woman whats best?
I always think its odd that the people who are antichoice dont consider the effect of a child on a mother and go straight for 'they can be adopted' even though theres a shortagr of adoptive parents and life chances for looked after children are worse than those who arent in the care system (which is already underfunded). Its all well and good being some kind of preachy selfrightous person about a cuty little baby but you dont see all theae anti choice people helping sort the lives of kids in care, adopting these children, fostering or donating to servuces for looked after kids. Its like its a baby that should be born but once its born (or been saved from murder) they dont care.