Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wish people would consider the 48 hour exclusion rule!

86 replies

Namechanger520 · 21/01/2017 19:12

I have namechanged for this thread.
I work as a nanny and don't want to risk outing myself!
Yesterday I had a phone call to say one of my charges had been sick in the night and just to prewarn me before I arrived, and double check if he should go to preschool!!
The child spent the whole day tired, laying around, had a temperature and no appetite and no inclination to want to do anything, however there was no more sickness just a constant streaming runny nose.
I text today to see how he is (as I was sick in the night last night and was worried his sibling might have been).
I received a reply to say he seems fine, enjoyed his swimming lesson and the birthday party he went to.
Aibu to think he shouldn't have gone swimming or soft play today?? I have worked in various forms of education and childcare over the years and I am getting fed up of parents who seem to think that the 48 hour exclusion rule is there for their inconvenience.
Maybe I am feeling bitter as I have spent the day feeling ill, so mumsnet aibu???

OP posts:
LivingOnTheDancefloor · 23/01/2017 15:50

So, those of you who are insisting the 48h rule has to be strictly followed, do you confirm that for a SAHM, if you are sick, you will not leave home for the length of the illness + 2 days. So, no school run, DCs who don't go to nursery/school won't leave the house either, etc.?
Or do you still do the school run? Go to the park with younger DCs?

oblada · 23/01/2017 18:59

Tellmehow - sounds like a poorly run nursery to me! I definitely would have looked for another childcare provider. To hide behind a policy is the height of stupidity in my view.

helensburgh · 23/01/2017 22:10

Living on the dance floor

I would.ask a friend to take sibling to school or to drop me some shopping and not go out.

Chickennuggetfeeder · 23/01/2017 22:14

The schools in my area have changed this rule to only if they have a bug and not if its a one off thing from eating something that dissagrees or if they ran around like a nutter. Sickness bugs seem to be on the rise

Nothanksdear · 23/01/2017 22:16

Itsnit a realistic rule

user1484317265 · 23/01/2017 22:21

I just want parents to follow the rules

Except there aren't any rules. What on earth makes people imagine that there are?

helensburgh · 25/01/2017 18:49

User I think rule is us lightly as it obviously cannot be enforced.

Outbackshack · 25/01/2017 19:01

My son threw up at nursery in Tuesday straight after eating so probably not due to a bug. Collected him straight away (luckily on mat leave with ds2) and keeping him home until Friday just in case. Not fair to risk it with other children

Ericaequites · 25/01/2017 19:03

A local school has found it necessary to send a letter to parents, reminding them that a child puking at the bus stop should not attend school. The 48 hour rule is sensible, but hard on working parents.

oblada · 25/01/2017 20:05

Outback - unless your son has other signs ie fever/diarrhea this seems OTT to me!

Chickennugget - nice to see some sensible schools around :)

Nataleejah · 25/01/2017 20:47

Yeah, but then you get parents upset if their child didn't get the attendance award.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page