You'll have to recap for me acasual because I don't see anything that warrants a response? Your only comment to me was that I was presenting opinion as fact?
A more detailed response to this is you like: this assessment of risk is not my opinion. I am stating the fact that that assessment has been made and the risk has been deemed too great. By people who would know.
To expand upon that, decisions for the wellbeing and good of society are made by suitable educated people who are employed to use their skills in the assessment of a situation, and give their professional opinion as to how to proceed.
Surveyor tells you your house is 99% likely to fall down; well it hasn't fallen down yet, this is only your opinion. The house has done nothing wrong - it deserves a chance.
Doctor tells you 85% people with your condition die without treatment. But this is only their opinion and shouldn't influence your decision.
The relevant authorities, in possession of all the facts - more than we have to hand - tells you a person with an emotional and legal commitment to a paedophile poses a significantly increased risk to children... and what?
I think you mentioned to someone else about us maybe stopping men become teachers because they're more likely to commit sexual offences? Now imagine being a man increases your risk to a child by 5%; this may be deemed by professionals an acceptable risk. Imagine being the spouse of a paedophile increases the risk posed by 23%. This may not be deemed an acceptable risk. See?