Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this should be paid for out pf your own pocket

54 replies

Catvsworld · 16/05/2016 11:18

I totally understand the want to not have children but unless getting pregnant accidentally would endanger your life of lead to other medical issues

Simply not wanting to have children should not be paid for by the tax payer as its not a medical issue its a want rather than a need and it's not as I'd there are not semi permant ways not to have children and condom and coil combined normally do the job

This is in light of the lady who won her case to be sterilised

OP posts:
LyingWitchInTheWardrobe2726 · 16/05/2016 12:51

Do stop troll hunting and just quietly report it then Hmm

dodobookends · 16/05/2016 12:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

noisyrice · 16/05/2016 13:59

What about teens? A baby would not necessarily cause them medical problems yet they can get pregnant?
Teens still have sex and most of them don't want a baby yet.

coffeeslave · 16/05/2016 14:10

I had my tubes tied on the NHS when I was 24. I wish I'd talked about it publicly at the time & got famous for it Grin

My reasoning for it is that a one-day outpatient procedure ultimately cost the NHS a lot less than a lifetime of contraception, any abortions I may have needed, and the NHS cost of any children I might have had.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page